Judge: Maurice A. Leiter, Case: BC694770, Date: 2025-03-06 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: BC694770 Hearing Date: March 6, 2025 Dept: 54
|
Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles |
|||
|
Ramona Burton, |
Plaintiff, |
Case No.: |
BC694770 |
|
vs. |
|
Tentative Ruling |
|
|
Long Beach Unified School District, et al., |
Defendants. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hearing Date: March 6, 2025
Department 54, Judge Maurice Leiter
Motion to Set Aside Dismissal
Moving Party: Plaintiff Ramona Burton
Responding Party: Defendants Long Beach Unified School District, et al.
T/R: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SET ASIDE
DISMISSAL IS DENIED.
PLAINTIFF TO NOTICE.
If the parties wish to submit on the tentative, please
email the courtroom at SMCdept54@lacourt.org with
notice to opposing counsel (or self-represented party) before 8:00 am on the
day of the hearing.
The Court considers the moving papers
and opposition.
CCP § 473(b) provides, in pertinent
part, “[t]he court may, upon any terms as may be just, relieve a party or his
or her legal representative from a judgment, dismissal, order, or other
proceeding taken against him or her through his or her mistake, inadvertence,
surprise, or excusable neglect.”
Plaintiff moves to set aside the
dismissal entered by the Court on September 22, 2022. The Court dismissed the
action after Plaintiff failed to be ready for trial. Plaintiff asserts that the
Court should not have dismissed the action because Plaintiff believed that the
notice of settlement filed the day before would vacate all hearing dates.
Defendants represented that the notice of settlement was invalid because there
was no finalized settlement and because Plaintiff continued to make changes to
the settlement after filing the notice. After dismissal, Plaintiff appealed,
and the Court of appeal affirmed the dismissal. The remittitur was issued in
January 2025.
The Court sees no reason to set aside
the dismissal. The Court’s decision was already appealed; the Court of Appeal
found that the Court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the action.
Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED.