Judge: Mel Red Recana, Case: 21STCV16533, Date: 2024-06-13 Tentative Ruling

All rulings shown here are TENTATIVE ONLY, and thus oral argument WILL be heard. All Counsel are still required to attend.


Case Number: 21STCV16533    Hearing Date: June 13, 2024    Dept: 45

Superior Court of California

County of Los Angeles

 

 

BELARARMINO GONZALEZ, et al.,

 

                             Plaintiffs,

 

                              vs.

SHIRLEY REPP AS TRUSTEE OF THE REPP SHIRLEY R. TRUST,

 

                              Defendant.

Case No.:  21STCV16533

DEPARTMENT 45

 

 

 

[TENTATIVE] RULING

 

 

 

Action Filed:  05/03/21

1st Amended Complaint Filed:  9/11/23

Trial Date:  None

 

Hearing date: June 13, 2024

Moving Party:  Plaintiff Jessica Cole

Responding Party:  None

Petitions to Confirm Minor’s Compromise

The Court considered the moving papers.

            The petitions are CONTINUED.

Background

This is a habitability case. Plaintiffs Belarmino Gonzalez; Jessica Coll; Benyamin Gonzalez, by and through his guardian ad litem, Jessica Coll; Jasmine Gonzalez, by and through her guardian ad litem Jessica Coll, filed this action on May 3, 2021 against defendant Shirley Repp, as trustee of the Repp Shirley R. Trust.

On September 11, 2023, Plaintiffs filed the first amended complaint (FAC), alleging causes of action for: (1) Breach of Contract; (2) Breach of Implied Warranty of Habitability; (3) Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; (4) Nuisance; (5) Negligence; (6) Wrongful Eviction; (7) Violation of Civil Code section 1942.4; and (8) Violation of Civil Code section 1940.2.

The FAC alleges that during Plaintiffs’ tenancy, Defendant allowed the following conditions to exist on the subject property: Infestation of insects; Vermin; Excessive garbage and unsanitary conditions; Visible mold; Defective plumbing; Defective flooring; Water leaks; and Dampness, among other things. (FAC, ¶ 14.) Plaintiffs allege they repeatedly notified Defendant of the subject property’s conditions, but Defendant failed to remedy the conditions, placing the health and safety of Plaintiffs at risk. (Id., ¶ 31-32.)

Discussion

 

Petitions to Approve Minor’s Compromise – Claimants Jasmine Gonzalez and Benyamin Gonzalez, minors, by and through their parent, Petitioner Jessica Cole (“Petitioner”), have agreed to settle their claims against Defendant, in exchange for $2,500 each, $1,500 of which will go to each Claimant. If approved, $1,000 of each Claimant’s total recovery will be used to pay attorney’s fees, leaving a balance of $1,500 for each Claimant, to be delivered to Petitioner and held in trust for Claimants. 

 

Court approval is required for all settlements of a minor’s claim. (Probate Code, §§ 3500, 3600, et seq.; Code Civ. Proc., § 372.) The court has reviewed the proposed settlement and finds it to be fair and reasonable.

 

However, the court has considered the Declaration of Jonathan Nielsen in support of the fee request, and the court finds that on the current record, and in consideration of the factors set forth in Cal Rules of Court, Rule 7.955(b), a fee of 25% of the gross settlement is reasonable, rather than 40%.

 

The court approves the following distribution of the settlement proceeds as to each Claimant: $625 for attorney fees, leaving $1,875 for each Claimant. Counsel is ordered to file amended orders accounting for this distribution.

 

Accordingly, the petitions to approve minor’s compromise are CONTINUED.

 

            It is so ordered.

 

Dated:

 

_______________________

MEL RED RECANA

Judge of the Superior Court