Judge: Melvin D. Sandvig, Case: 21CHCV00365, Date: 2023-07-20 Tentative Ruling

Counsel wishing to submit on a tentative ruling may inform the clerk or courtroom assisant in North Valley Department F47, 9425 Penfield Ave., Chatsworth, CA 91311, at (818) 407-2247.  Please be aware that unless all parties submit, the matter will still be called for hearing and may be argued by any appearing/non-submitting parties. If the matter is submitted on the court's tentative ruling by all parties, counsel for moving party shall give notice of ruling. This may be done by incorporating verbatim the court's tentative ruling. The tentative ruling may be extracted verbatim by copying and specially pasting, as unformatted text, from the Los Angeles Superior Court’s website, http://www.lasuperiorcourt.org. All hearings on law and motion and other calendar matters are generally NOT transcribed by a court reporter unless one is provided by the party(ies).


Case Number: 21CHCV00365    Hearing Date: July 20, 2023    Dept: F47

Dept. F47

Date: 7/20/23

Case #21CHCV00365

 

MOTION SETTING ASIDE DISMISSAL & ENTERING JUDGMENT

 

Motion filed on 2/14/23.

 

MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff Discover Bank

RESPONDING PARTY: Defendant Florence Lankford

 

RELIEF REQUESTED: An order setting aside the dismissal of this action and entering judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant due to Defendant’s default under the terms of a written settlement agreement between Plaintiff and Defendant. 

 

RULING: The motion is placed off calendar. 

 

On 5/7/21, Plaintiff Discover Bank (Plaintiff) filed this action for account stated and open book account against Defendant Florence Lankford (Defendant).  Before Defendant made an appearance in this action, Plaintiff and Defendant entered into a written Settlement Agreement pursuant to which the parties agreed that judgment would not be entered as long as Defendant made certain periodic payments toward the settlement amount.  (See Haney Decl., Ex.1).  Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, this action was thereafter dismissed with the Court retaining jurisdiction under CCP 664.6.  (Haney Decl., Ex.1 ¶4, Ex.2).  Defendant has defaulted under the Settlement Agreement and failed to cure such default.  (Haney Decl., Ex.3). 

 

On 2/14/23, pursuant to CCP 664.6, Plaintiff filed the instant motion seeking an order setting aside the dismissal of this action and entering judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant due to Defendant’s default under the terms of a written Settlement Agreement between Plaintiff and Defendant.  The motion was originally scheduled for hearing on 5/23/23.

 

On 5/23/23, the matter was continued to 7/20/23 due to issues with the service of the motion.  Specifically, the Court noted that the Settlement Agreement provides that a motion to obtain judgment shall be served on Defendant, or Defendant’s counsel, if applicable, by mail at Defendant’s “address of record.”  (See 5/23/23 Minute Order citing Haney Decl., Ex.1 ¶5).  The proof of service for the motion’s original hearing date indicated that it was mailed to Defendant on 2/13/23.  However, since  Defendant never appeared in this action, there was/is no “address of record” for Defendant in the court file.  Nor was/is an “address of record” for Defendant set forth in the Settlement Agreement.  Since there was no response to the motion from Defendant, there was no way to confirm that the motion was properly served on Defendant and the matter was continued.  (See 5/23/23 Minute Order). 

 

Thereafter, on 6/1/23, Plaintiff filed a “Notice of Continued Motion for Setting Aside Dismissal and Entering Judgment Pursuant to Defendant’s Default Under Settlement and Release Agreement” and a proof of service for the notice indicating that it was mailed to Defendant on 5/31/23 at the same unconfirmed address where the motion was served by mail for the 5/23/23 hearing date.  

 

On 7/12/23, Plaintiff filed a proof of service indicating that after two unsuccessful attempts at personal service, the motion and supporting documents were served on Defendant via substitute service on 7/8/23 and, thereafter, mailed on 7/11/23.  (See Proof of Service filed 7/12/23). 

 

The substitute service on 7/8/23 and the subsequent mailing are untimely for the 7/20/23 hearing date.  A motion must be served at least 16 court days before the hearing date, plus additional days if served by a manner other than personal service.  See CCP 1005(b).  Substitute service is deemed complete on the 10th day after mailing.  CCP 415.20.  The substitute service of the motion on 7/8/23 only provided 9 court days’ notice before the 7/20/23 hearing date. 

 

Again, there is no response to the motion to cure the defect in notice.  Therefore, the matter is placed off calendar.