Judge: Melvin D. Sandvig, Case: 23CHCP00299, Date: 2023-10-19 Tentative Ruling

Counsel wishing to submit on a tentative ruling may inform the clerk or courtroom assisant in North Valley Department F47, 9425 Penfield Ave., Chatsworth, CA 91311, at (818) 407-2247.  Please be aware that unless all parties submit, the matter will still be called for hearing and may be argued by any appearing/non-submitting parties. If the matter is submitted on the court's tentative ruling by all parties, counsel for moving party shall give notice of ruling. This may be done by incorporating verbatim the court's tentative ruling. The tentative ruling may be extracted verbatim by copying and specially pasting, as unformatted text, from the Los Angeles Superior Court’s website, http://www.lasuperiorcourt.org. All hearings on law and motion and other calendar matters are generally NOT transcribed by a court reporter unless one is provided by the party(ies).


Case Number: 23CHCP00299    Hearing Date: April 11, 2024    Dept: F47

Dept. F47

Date: 4/11/24

Case #23CHCP00299

 

PETITION FOR PRE-SUIT DISCOVERY

 

Petition filed on 7/18/23.

 

MOVING PARTY: Petitioner Estanislao Rosales

RESPONDING PARTY: Respondent Saul Islas

 

RELIEF REQUESTED: An order pursuant to CCP 2035.010(a) and CCP 2035.020 permitting Petitioner Estanislao Rosales (Petitioner) to: : (1) obtain an independent medical examination of Respondent Saul Islas (Respondent) prior to surgery or any invasive medical procedure; (2) depose Respondent prior to the independent medical examination; and (3) subpoena the medical treatment records, including imaging, of Respondent for the independent medical examiner. 

 

RULING: The petition is denied. 

 

This petition arises out of an alleged motor vehicle accident (“subject incident”) occurring at approximately 3:45 p.m. on October 17, 2022 on the southbound 5 freeway just north of the 210 freeway overpass. (See Doyle Decl. ¶3).  State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”) has received a demand letter on behalf of Respondent Saul Islas (“Claimant”) dated January 23, 2023.  (Id. at ¶4; Ex.A).  The demand letter stated that Claimant was represented by Hillstone Law and alleges that Claimant was injured because of Petitioner Estanislao Rosales’s (Petitioner) negligence in the subject incident.  (Id. at ¶¶4-6; Ex.A).  The letter alleged Claimant had sustained injuries to his neck, back, left knee, and left elbow.  (Id. at ¶ 6; Ex.A).  The letter also indicated that Claimant had complaints of headaches.  (Id.).  The letter alleged that findings from x-rays taken at Diagnostic Imaging Service Center indicated that Claimant had spondylosis at C6-C7, C5-C6, and C4-C5, and joint effusion in the left knee.  (Id.) The letter stated that on November 3, 2022, Claimant had an MRI of his cervica1 spine, thoracic spine and left knee taken at ProHealth Advanced Imaging.  (Id.).  The findings allegedly showed Claimant had a 5-6 mm disc herniation at the C6-C7; 3-4 mm at C5-C6; 1-2 mm at C4-C5; and tearing of the posterior horn in the1eft shoulder.  (Id.).  As of the January 23, 2023 letter, Dr. Jonathan Frank, M.D. discussed possible injections to his left knee.  (Id.).

 

A later correspondence from Director of Operations at Hillstone Law, PC, Michael Romero, dated June 14, 2023, indicated that Claimant was scheduled to have a cervical fusion on August 11, 2023.  (Id. at ¶7; Ex.B).  Mr. Romero estimated that the cost of the procedure is $295,000.00. (Id.)  In this correspondence, a policy limits demand was made with a deadline of May 12, 2023. (Id.)

 

State Farm has retained the law firm of Toschi, Collins, Doyle & Houvener (“TCDH”) to represent Petitioner with respect to the demand letter and the subject incident.  (Id. at ¶4).  On or about June 28, 2023, Steven C. Toschi, a partner at TCDH, wrote a letter to Claimant’s attorney on behalf of Petitioner requesting that Claimant submit to an independent medical examination prior to any surgery; provide a statement, and provide medical records.  (Id. at ¶8, Ex.C). Petitioner made this request to preserve vital evidence which he contends will be lost if Claimant undergoes surgery.  (Id.).  The letter was identified as a litigation hold.  (Id.)

 

Petitioner sent a notice of demand for an independent medical examination of Claimant with Dr. Kendall Wager for July 31, 2023.  (Id. at ¶9; Ex.D).  On June 29, 2023, Claimant objected to Petitioner’s demand for independent medical examination and indicated that he would not appear for the examination.  (Id. at ¶10; Ex.E).

 

On July 18, 2023, Petitioner filed the instant petition seeking an order pursuant to CCP 2035.010(a) and CCP 2035.020 permitting Petitioner to: (1) obtain an independent medical examination of Respondent prior to surgery or any invasive medical procedure; (2) depose Respondent prior to the independent medical examination; and (3) subpoena the medical treatment records, including imaging, of Respondent for the independent medical examiner.  On July 13, 2023, notice of the petition was electronically served on attorneys at Hillstone Law, PC.  On 7/28/23, Petitioner re-filed the papers in support of the petition and a notice indicating a hearing date of January 11, 2024 for the petition.  These documents were also electronically served on attorneys at Hillstone Law, PC.

 

On August 1, 2023, Petitioner’s ex parte application to advance the hearing date and shorten time for service was denied.  (See 8/1/23 Minute Order).  However, on the Court’s own motion, the January 11, 2024 hearing date was advanced and continued to October 19, 2023.  Id.  Petitioner was also ordered to give notice upon service.  Id.  Nothing was filed by petitioner after the 8/1/23 Minute Order and Respondent had not appeared in this action. 

 

Petitioner did not appear at the 10/19/23 hearing.  (See 10/19/23 Minute Order).  On 10/19/23, the Court continued the hearing due to issues with service of the petition and notice of hearing.  Id. 

 

The Court also set an Order to Show Cause Re: Sanctions for Petitioner’s Failure to Appear on 4/11/24 and noted that if Petitioner fails to appear at the hearing on 4/11/24, the petition will be denied or dismissed without further notice.

 

Nothing has been filed since the 10/19/23 hearing and there is still no evidence that Petitioner served the petition and notice of hearing thereon in the same manner as provided for the service of a summons at least 20 days before the hearing date as required.  See CCP 2035.040(a)-(c).    

 

Based on the foregoing, the petition is denied and the matter is dismissed.