Judge: Melvin D. Sandvig, Case: 23CHCV00264, Date: 2024-07-11 Tentative Ruling

Counsel wishing to submit on a tentative ruling may inform the clerk or courtroom assisant in North Valley Department F47, 9425 Penfield Ave., Chatsworth, CA 91311, at (818) 407-2247.  Please be aware that unless all parties submit, the matter will still be called for hearing and may be argued by any appearing/non-submitting parties. If the matter is submitted on the court's tentative ruling by all parties, counsel for moving party shall give notice of ruling. This may be done by incorporating verbatim the court's tentative ruling. The tentative ruling may be extracted verbatim by copying and specially pasting, as unformatted text, from the Los Angeles Superior Court’s website, http://www.lasuperiorcourt.org. All hearings on law and motion and other calendar matters are generally NOT transcribed by a court reporter unless one is provided by the party(ies).

Case Number: 23CHCV00264    Hearing Date: July 11, 2024    Dept: F47

Dept. F47

Date: 7/11/24

Case #23CHCV00264

MOTION TO DEEM REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS ADMITTED

Motion filed on 4/4/24.

MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff Rock Creek Capital, LLC

RESPONDING PARTY: Defendant Norma S. Carcamo

NOTICE: ok

RELIEF REQUESTED: An order deeming the truth of matters specified in Plaintiff’s Request for Admissions served on Defendant Norma S. Carcamo. 

RULING: The motion is granted.

SUMMARY OF ACTION & PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On 1/30/23, Plaintiff Rock Creek Capital, LLC (Plaintiff) filed this action against Defendant Norma S. Carcamo (Defendant) for breach of contract.  On 4/4/23, Defendant, representing herself, filed an answer to the complaint.    

On 2/2/24, Plaintiff served Defendant, by  U.S. Mail, with Requests for Admissions, Set 1.  (Aguirre Decl., Ex.1).  Defendant failed to serve responses.  (Aguirre Decl.).  Therefore, on 4/4/24, Plaintiff filed and served the instant motion seeking an order deeming the truth of matters specified in Plaintiff’s Request for Admissions served on Defendant.  Defendant has not opposed or otherwise responded to the motion.

ANALYSIS

Due to Defendant’s failure to respond to the Requests for Admissions, Plaintiff is entitled to an order deeming the matters admitted.  CCP 2033.280(b), (c).

CONCLUSION

The motion is granted.