Judge: Michael E. Whitaker, Case: 19STCV13724, Date: 2023-04-06 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 19STCV13724 Hearing Date: April 6, 2023 Dept: 32
PLEASE NOTE: Parties are
encouraged to meet and confer concerning this tentative ruling to determine if
a resolution may be reached. If the
parties are unable to reach a resolution and a party intends to submit on this
tentative ruling, the party must send an email to the Court at sscdept32@lacourt.org indicating that party’s intention to submit. The email shall include the case number, date
and time of the hearing, counsel’s contact information (if applicable), and the
identity of the party submitting on this tentative ruling. If the Court does not receive an email
indicating the parties are submitting on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may place the motion off calendar or
adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court. If all parties do not submit on this
tentative ruling, they should arrange to appear in-person or remotely (which is
highly encouraged). Further, after the Court has posted/issued a tentative
ruling, the Court has the inherent authority to prohibit the withdrawal of the
subject motion and adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court.
TENTATIVE RULING
|
DEPARTMENT |
32 |
|
HEARING DATE |
April 6, 2023 |
|
CASE NUMBER |
19STCV13724 |
|
MOTION |
Motion for Order Issuing Payment of Deposition Fees Owed;
Request for Monetary Sanctions |
|
MOVING PARTY |
Defendants Jessica Yadegar, Saeed Yadegar, and Jasmine
Yadegar |
|
OPPOSING PARTY |
None |
MOTION
Defendants
Jessica Yadegar, Saeed Yadegar, and Jasmine Yadegar (collectively, Defendants) move for an order issuing payment by
counsel for Plaintiff Yassine Memmi (Plaintiff) of deposition fees owed to
Defendants’ retained expert witness, Dr. James Kayvanfar, M.D. (Kayvanfar),
with interest. Defendants seek
monetary sanctions in connection with the motion. Plaintiff has not filed an opposition.
ANALYSIS
Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure, section 2034.450,
subdivision (c), “[i]f the deposition of the expert takes longer than
anticipated, the party giving notice of the deposition shall pay the balance of
the expert’s fee within five days of receipt of an itemized statement from the
expert.”
Here, on November 22, 2022, Plaintiff’s counsel, Casey Hultin
(Hultin), deposed Kayvanfar.
(Declaration of Mark P. Lascola, ¶ 5.)
Said deposition went beyond the anticipated one hour length by
approximately 57 minutes. (Declaration
of Mark P. Lascola, ¶ 5, Exhibit B.) On
November 29, 2022, Defendants’ counsel’s legal assistant provided an itemized
statement from Kavyanfar to Plaintiff’s counsel, requesting the outstanding
balance of $1,600 owed to Kayvanfar for the unanticipated length of his
deposition. (Declaration of Mark P.
Lascola, ¶ 6, Exhibit C.) As of the date
of filing of the instant motion, Defendants have yet to receive payment for
Kayvanfar’s deposition from Plaintiff’s counsel. (Declaration of Mark P. Lascola, ¶ 7.)
Based on Plaintiff’s counsel’s failure to pay Kayvanfar’s
outstanding deposition fee, Defendants seek an order form the Court issuing
payment by Plaintiff’s counsel for the deposition fees owed. However, the Court notes that Defendants have
failed to cite to a statutory provision authorizing this type of relief. Accordingly, the Court finds it does not have
the authority to issue such an order, and denies Defendants’ motion on this
ground.
Defendants
request monetary sanctions in connection with the motion. Defendants cite to Code of Civil Procedure
section 2023.010 in support of their request for monetary sanctions. However, the Court finds that the statutory
scheme of Code of Civil Procedure 2023 does not contain a provision which
enforces the award of monetary sanctions against Plaintiff or Plaintiff’s
counsel for the conduct as described.
Accordingly, the Court denies Defendants’ request for monetary
sanctions.
CONCLUSION AND ORDER
Accordingly, the Court denies
Defendants’ motion for an order issuing payment by counsel for Plaintiff of
Kavyanfar’s outstanding deposition fee pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure
section 2034.450, and further denies Defendants’ request for monetary sanctions.
Defendants are ordered to provide
notice of the Court’s ruling and file proof of service of such.