Judge: Michael E. Whitaker, Case: 20STCV08325, Date: 2022-12-06 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 20STCV08325 Hearing Date: December 6, 2022 Dept: 32
PLEASE NOTE: Parties are encouraged to meet and confer concerning this tentative ruling to determine if a resolution may be reached. If the parties are unable to reach a resolution and a party intends to submit on this tentative ruling, the party must send an email to the Court at sscdept32@lacourt.org indicating that party’s intention to submit. The email shall include the case number, date and time of the hearing, counsel’s contact information (if applicable), and the identity of the party submitting on this tentative ruling. If the Court does not receive an email indicating the parties are submitting on this tentative ruling and there are no appearances at the hearing, the Court may place the motion off calendar or adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court. If all parties do not submit on this tentative ruling, they should arrange to appear in-person or remotely (which is highly encouraged). Further, after the Court has posted/issued a tentative ruling, the Court has the inherent authority to prohibit the withdrawal of the subject motion and adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court.
TENTATIVE RULING
|
DEPARTMENT |
32 |
|
HEARING DATE |
December 6, 2022 |
|
CASE NUMBER |
20STCV08325 |
|
MOTION |
Motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint |
|
MOVING PARTY |
Defendant Leanna Furtado |
|
OPPOSING PARTY |
None |
Defendant Leanna Furtado (Defendant) appears specially and moves to quash service of the summons and complaint. Plaintiffs Christian Argueta and Jorge Nunez (collectively, Plaintiffs) have not filed an opposition.
Preliminarily the Court notes that Defendant filed the instant motion on May 11, 2022. On November 1, 2022, Plaintiffs filed a proof of service with the Court reflecting personal service of the Summons and Complaint on Defendant on October 24, 2022. Defendant then filed her Answer with the Court on November 22, 2022. As such, the Court denies the instant motion as moot.