Judge: Michael E. Whitaker, Case: 20STCV23071, Date: 2022-12-12 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 20STCV23071    Hearing Date: December 12, 2022    Dept: 32

PLEASE NOTE:   Parties are encouraged to meet and confer concerning this tentative ruling to determine if a resolution may be reached.  If the parties are unable to reach a resolution and a party intends to submit on this tentative ruling, the party must send an email to the Court at sscdept32@lacourt.org indicating that party’s intention to submit.  The email shall include the case number, date and time of the hearing, counsel’s contact information (if applicable), and the identity of the party submitting on this tentative ruling.  If the Court does not receive an email indicating the parties are submitting on this tentative ruling and there are no appearances at the hearing, the Court may place the motion off calendar or adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court.  If all parties do not submit on this tentative ruling, they should arrange to appear in-person or remotely (which is highly encouraged).  Further, after the Court has posted/issued a tentative ruling, the Court has the inherent authority to prohibit the withdrawal of the subject motion and adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court. 

 

TENTATIVE RULING

 

DEPARTMENT

32

HEARING DATE

December 12, 2022

CASE NUMBER

20STCV23071

MOTION

Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice

MOVING PARTY

Attorney Paul Miailovich

OPPOSING PARTY

None

 

Attorney Paul Miailovich (Miailovich) moves to be admitted pro hac vice as counsel for Defendant Lorenzo Quiroz, Jr. (Defendant). 

 

Per California Rules of Court, rule 9.40, attorneys who are licensed to practice and in good standing in other states may, upon court approval, appear as counsel pro hac vice in a pending case if an active member of the State Bar of California also appears as counsel of record. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 9.40, subd. (a).)

 

Miailovich is licensed to practice and in good standing in Idaho.  Miailovich is a resident of Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco Mexico on a Temporary Residence Visa, and has not appeared pro hac vice in California within the last two years.  Miailovich is associated with Defendant’s counsel, Andrew Post, who is licensed to practice in California.  

 

However, the proof of service Miailovich attached to his application supposedly establishing service on the State Bar of California is unsigned.  (See Application of Paul Miailovich, Exhibit A.)  Service of the application on the State Bar of California at its San Francisco office is required.  (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 9.40, subds. (c).) 

 

Accordingly, the Court denies the application to appear pro hac vice without prejudice as procedurally defective.

 

Defendant shall provide notice of this order and file proof of service of such.