Judge: Michael E. Whitaker, Case: 20STCV30488, Date: 2023-04-12 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 20STCV30488 Hearing Date: April 12, 2023 Dept: 32
PLEASE NOTE: Parties are
encouraged to meet and confer concerning this tentative ruling to determine if
a resolution may be reached. If the
parties are unable to reach a resolution and a party intends to submit on this
tentative ruling, the party must send an email to the Court at sscdept32@lacourt.org indicating that party’s intention to submit. The email shall include the case number, date
and time of the hearing, counsel’s contact information (if applicable), and the
identity of the party submitting on this tentative ruling. If the Court does not receive an email
indicating the parties are submitting on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may place the motion off calendar or
adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court. If all parties do not submit on this
tentative ruling, they should arrange to appear in-person or remotely (which is
highly encouraged). Further, after the Court has posted/issued a tentative
ruling, the Court has the inherent authority to prohibit the withdrawal of the
subject motion and adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court.
TENTATIVE
RULING
|
DEPARTMENT |
32 |
|
HEARING DATE |
April
12, 2023 |
|
CASE NUMBER |
20STCV30488 |
|
MOTION |
Motion
to Dismiss |
|
MOVING PARTY |
Defendant
John Barlow |
|
OPPOSING PARTY |
None |
MOTION
Plaintiff Rennae Haines (“Plaintiff”)
sued Defendant John Barlow (“Defendant”) based on a slip and fall. Plaintiff, who is self-represented, subsequently
died. [1]
Defendant moves to dismiss this action due to Plaintiff’s death. The motion is unopposed.
REQUEST
FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
Under Evidence Code section 452, “[j]udicial notice may be taken of
the following matters to the extent that they are not embraced within Section
451: . . . (c) Official acts of the
legislative, executive, and judicial departments of the United States and of
any state of the United States . . . .” (Evid.
Code, § 452, subd. (c).) And pursuant to
Evidence Code section 453, “the trial court shall take judicial notice of any
matter specified in Section 452 if a party requests it and: (a) Gives each adverse party sufficient
notice of the request, through the pleadings or otherwise, to enable such
adverse party to prepare to meet the request; and (b) Furnishes the court with sufficient
information to enable it to take judicial notice of the matter. (Evid. Code, § 453, subds. (a)-(b).)
Here, under Evidence Code sections 452 and 453, the Court grants
Defendant’s unopposed request for judicial notice of Plaintiff’s death
certificate.
ANALYSIS
“A pending action or proceeding does not abate
by the death of a party if the cause of action survives.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 377.21.) Death of a party occurring before judgment,
makes it improper to render judgment for or against the deceased party without
first taking the procedural step of substituting the executor or administrator. (See Grappo v. McMills (2017) 11
Cal.App.5th 996, 1007.) To wit, “on
motion after the death of a person who commenced an action or proceeding, the
court shall allow a pending action or proceeding that does not abate to be
continued by the decedent's personal representative or, if none, by the
decedent's successor in interest.” (Code
Civ. Proc., § 377.31.)
Defendant has procured Plaintiff’s
death certificate. As such, Plaintiff
cannot maintain this action, and this Court has not issued an order permitting
Plaintiff’s personal representative or successor in interest to prosecute the
action.
Accordingly, the Court grants Defendant’s
motion to dismiss and orders the entire action dismissed with prejudice per the
Court’s inherent authority to dismiss cases for failing to prosecute
diligently. (See Code Civ. Proc., §
583.150; Lyons v. Wickhorst (1986) 42 Cal.3d 911, 915 [“in the absence
of express statutory authority, a trial court may, under certain circumstances,
invoke its limited, inherent discretionary power to dismiss claims with
prejudice”].)
Defendant shall provide notice of the Court’s ruling and file a proof
of service of such.
[1] Counsel for Plaintiff, Daniel D. Geoulla of B&D
Law Group, APLC was relieved on December 16, 2022. (See Order Granting Attorney’s Motion to be Relieved as
Counsel-Civil.)