Judge: Michael E. Whitaker, Case: 20STCV32722, Date: 2023-04-28 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 20STCV32722 Hearing Date: April 28, 2023 Dept: 32
PLEASE NOTE: Parties are
encouraged to meet and confer concerning this tentative ruling to determine if
a resolution may be reached. If the
parties are unable to reach a resolution and a party intends to submit on this
tentative ruling, the party must send an email to the Court at sscdept32@lacourt.org indicating that party’s intention to submit. The email shall include the case number, date
and time of the hearing, counsel’s contact information (if applicable), and the
identity of the party submitting on this tentative ruling. If the Court does not receive an email
indicating the parties are submitting on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may place the motion off calendar or
adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court. If all parties do not submit on this
tentative ruling, they should arrange to appear in-person or remotely (which is
highly encouraged). Further, after the Court has posted/issued a tentative
ruling, the Court has the inherent authority to prohibit the withdrawal of the
subject motion and adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court.
TENTATIVE RULING
|
DEPARTMENT |
32 |
|
HEARING DATE |
April 28, 2023 |
|
CASE NUMBER |
20STCV32722 |
|
MOTION |
Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel |
|
Attorneys Sally S.
Chan and Karen K. Tso of West Themis Law, PC |
|
|
OPPOSING PARTY |
None |
MOTION
Attorneys Sally S. Chan and Karen K.
Tso of West Themis Law, PC (Counsel) move to be relieved as counsel for Plaintiff
Yohana Calderon (Plaintiff).
ANALYSIS
Counsel has
filed forms MC-051 and MC-052 and has lodged with the Court copies of the
proposed order on form MC-053 as required.
(Cal Rules of Court, rule 3.1362.)
Counsel state that “the relationship of trust and confidence essential
to the attorney-client relationship has ceased to exist. Irreconcilable differences have arisen between
client and attorney making it unreasonably difficult to carry out the
employment effectively.” (See MC-052.)
The Court finds that these are valid reasons for the withdrawal. (See Rules Prof. Conduct, rule 1.16.) Accordingly, the Court grants the motion.
However,
the Court finds that the proposed order (MC-053) is incomplete and contains errors. Consequently, the Court orders Counsel to file
within 5 calendar days of the hearing an amended form MC-053 which should include information about all future hearings
and proceedings noticed by any party, or ordered by the Court including but not
limited to the trial and final status conference.
Further, Counsel
must serve the signed order (MC-053) within 10 days of the date of the order,
and file a proof of service of such.
Counsel will remain the attorney of record for Plaintiff until Counsel
files the requisite proof of service.
(See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1362(e).)