Judge: Michael E. Whitaker, Case: 21STCV18832, Date: 2023-03-01 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 21STCV18832    Hearing Date: March 1, 2023    Dept: 32

PLEASE NOTE:   Parties are encouraged to meet and confer concerning this tentative ruling to determine if a resolution may be reached.  If the parties are unable to reach a resolution and a party intends to submit on this tentative ruling, the party must send an email to the Court at sscdept32@lacourt.org indicating that party’s intention to submit.  The email shall include the case number, date and time of the hearing, counsel’s contact information (if applicable), and the identity of the party submitting on this tentative ruling.  If the Court does not receive an email indicating the parties are submitting on this tentative ruling and there are no appearances at the hearing, the Court may place the motion off calendar or adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court.  If all parties do not submit on this tentative ruling, they should arrange to appear in-person or remotely (which is highly encouraged).  Further, after the Court has posted/issued a tentative ruling, the Court has the inherent authority to prohibit the withdrawal of the subject motion and adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court. 

 

TENTATIVE RULING

 

DEPARTMENT

32

HEARING DATE

March 1, 2023

CASE NUMBER

21STCV18832

MOTION

Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel

MOVING PARTY

Paul Aghabala and Natali Shabani of Prestige Law Firm

OPPOSING PARTY

None

 

MOTION

 

            Paul Aghabala and Natali Shabani of Prestige Law Firm (Counsel) moves to be relieved as counsel for Seven Kovalski, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, Tina Tinker (Plaintiff).  

 

ANALYSIS

 

Counsel has filed forms MC-051 and MC-052 and has lodged with the Court a copy of the proposed order on form MC-053 as required.  (Cal Rules of Court, rule 3.1362.)  The basis for the motion is communication between Plaintiff and his attorneys has been futile.  Counsel states that Plaintiff’s mother has indicated that she has also been unable to get in touch with her son, as he has been with his father and the father has alienated Plaintiff from his mother.  This is a valid reason for withdrawal.  (See Rules Prof. Conduct, rule 1.16.). Accordingly, the Court grants the motion.

 

The Court further orders Counsel to resubmit form MC-053 to reflect an up-to-date status on future hearings in the case and make sure all hearing dates are clearly visible on the form.

 

            Counsel must serve the signed order (form MC-053), which shall include information about all future hearings and proceedings noticed by any party, or ordered by the Court, on Plaintiff and all other parties who have appeared in the action, within 10 days of the date of this Order, and file a proof of service of such.  Counsel will remain the attorney of record for Plaintiff until Counsel files the requisite proof of service.  (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1362(e).)