Judge: Michael E. Whitaker, Case: 21STCV21272, Date: 2023-05-09 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STCV21272 Hearing Date: May 9, 2023 Dept: 32
PLEASE NOTE: Parties are
encouraged to meet and confer concerning this tentative ruling to determine if
a resolution may be reached. If the
parties are unable to reach a resolution and a party intends to submit on this
tentative ruling, the party must send an email to the Court at sscdept32@lacourt.org indicating that party’s intention to submit. The email shall include the case number, date
and time of the hearing, counsel’s contact information (if applicable), and the
identity of the party submitting on this tentative ruling. If the Court does not receive an email
indicating the parties are submitting on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may place the motion off calendar or
adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court. If all parties do not submit on this
tentative ruling, they should arrange to appear in-person or remotely (which is
highly encouraged). Further, after the Court has posted/issued a tentative
ruling, the Court has the inherent authority to prohibit the withdrawal of the
subject motion and adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court.
TENTATIVE RULING
|
DEPARTMENT |
32 |
|
HEARING DATE |
May 9, 2023 |
|
CASE NUMBER |
21STCV21272 |
|
MOTION |
Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel |
|
Aidin Ghavimi of Starpoint,
LC |
|
|
OPPOSING PARTY |
None |
MOTION
Aidin
Ghavimi of Starpoint, LC (Counsel) moves to be relieved as counsel for Plaintiff
Ashton Montalvo (Plaintiff).
ANALYSIS
Counsel has filed forms MC-051 and MC-052 with the Court. The basis for the motion is a lack of
communication and breakdown in attorney-client relationship. Counsel advances his own declaration to
describe the following efforts he has made in an attempt to contact Plaintiff
after receiving notice of Plaintiff’s incarceration status:
·
On or about November 28, 2022, I called the
Martinez Detention Facility and confirmed that Plaintiff was being held there.
I requested to speak with him but was not allowed to.
·
On or about January 12, 2022, my office sent a
letter with the draft settlement agreement enclosed via certified mail – return
receipt to the Martinez Detention Facility, attention: Ashton Montalvo, Inmate
Number: CC22NI588. We received no response.
(Declaration
of Aidin Ghavimi, ¶¶ 12, 13.)
Because of the special circumstances
of Plaintiff’s current detention in a correctional facility, the Court finds
Counsel’s described attempts to contact Plaintiff insufficient on their own to
establish a comprehensive effort to gain contact with Plaintiff. The Court notes for example Counsel fails to
note whether the Martinez Detention Facility allows in-person visits and
communication with Plaintiff, or whether Counsel has attempted to facilitate
such a visit. Accordingly, the Court
finds Counsel has failed to establish a valid reason for withdrawal at this
time, and denies Counsel’s motion as such.
The Court additionally notes Counsel
has failed to lodge with the Court a copy of the proposed order on form MC-053
as required. (Cal Rules of Court, rule
3.1362, subd. (e).)
Counsel is ordered to
provide notice of this order and file a proof of service of such.