Judge: Michael E. Whitaker, Case: 21STCV31328, Date: 2023-04-26 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STCV31328 Hearing Date: April 26, 2023 Dept: 32
PLEASE NOTE: Parties are
encouraged to meet and confer concerning this tentative ruling to determine if
a resolution may be reached. If the
parties are unable to reach a resolution and a party intends to submit on this
tentative ruling, the party must send an email to the Court at sscdept32@lacourt.org indicating that party’s intention to submit. The email shall include the case number, date
and time of the hearing, counsel’s contact information (if applicable), and the
identity of the party submitting on this tentative ruling. If the Court does not receive an email
indicating the parties are submitting on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may place the motion off calendar or
adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court. If all parties do not submit on this
tentative ruling, they should arrange to appear in-person or remotely (which is
highly encouraged). Further, after the Court has posted/issued a tentative
ruling, the Court has the inherent authority to prohibit the withdrawal of the
subject motion and adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court.
TENTATIVE RULING
|
DEPARTMENT |
32 |
|
HEARING DATE |
April 26, 2023 |
|
CASE NUMBER |
21STCV31328 |
|
MOTIONS |
Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel |
|
Attorney Mohamed
Eldessouky |
|
|
OPPOSING PARTY |
None |
MOTION
Mohamed Eldessouky of Eldessouky
Law, APC (Counsel) moves to be relieved as counsel for Plaintiff Lisseth Cardenas
(Plaintiff). The motion is unopposed.
ANALYSIS
Counsel has
filed forms MC-051 and MC-052 and has lodged with the Court copy of the
proposed order on form MC-053 as required.
(Cal Rules of Court, rule 3.1362.)
The basis for the motion is a mandatory withdrawal under the California
Rules of Professional Conduct. In
particular, Counsel declares: “In
accordance with the Ethics Rules (California Rules of Professional Conduct) my
withdrawal is mandatory but I have been unable to obtain a signed Substitution
of Attorney. I confirmed the application of the Rules independently and with
the State Bar Ethics hotline.” (See
MC-052.) This is a valid reason for
withdrawal. (See Rules Prof. Conduct,
rule 1.16.) Accordingly, the Court
grants the motion.
The Court
further orders Counsel to resubmit form MC-053 to reflect the following
additional hearings: (1) Final Status Conference on November 20, 2023, and (2)
Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal on August 20, 2024.
Counsel
must serve the signed order (form MC-053), which shall include information
about all future hearings and proceedings noticed by any party, or ordered by
the Court, on Plaintiff and all other parties who have appeared in the action,
within 10 days of the date of this Order, and file a proof of service of
such. Counsel will remain the attorney
of record for Plaintiff until Counsel files the requisite proof of service. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1362(e).)