Judge: Michael E. Whitaker, Case: 21STCV31398, Date: 2022-12-13 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 21STCV31398    Hearing Date: December 13, 2022    Dept: 32

PLEASE NOTE:   Parties are encouraged to meet and confer concerning this tentative ruling to determine if a resolution may be reached.  If the parties are unable to reach a resolution and a party intends to submit on this tentative ruling, the party must send an email to the Court at sscdept32@lacourt.org indicating that party’s intention to submit.  The email shall include the case number, date and time of the hearing, counsel’s contact information (if applicable), and the identity of the party submitting on this tentative ruling.  If the Court does not receive an email indicating the parties are submitting on this tentative ruling and there are no appearances at the hearing, the Court may place the motion off calendar or adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court.  If all parties do not submit on this tentative ruling, they should arrange to appear in-person or remotely (which is highly encouraged).  Further, after the Court has posted/issued a tentative ruling, the Court has the inherent authority to prohibit the withdrawal of the subject motion and adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court. 

TENTATIVE RULING

MOTION

            DRE Law, APC (Counsel) moves to be relieved as counsel for Plaintiff Noah Christie, aka Noah Jaso (Plaintiff).  

ANALYSIS

Counsel has filed forms MC-051 and MC-052 and has lodged with the Court a copy of the proposed order on form MC-053 as required.  (Cal Rules of Court, rule 3.1362.)  The basis for the motion is the attorney-client relationship has completely broken down and has deteriorated beyond the point of repair, making Counsel’s effective representation of Plaintiff to be unreasonably difficult and impossible.  Those are valid reasons for the withdrawal.  (See Rules Prof. Conduct, rule 1.16.)  Accordingly, the Court grants the motion.

Notwithstanding, the Court notes that the information contained in the proposed order (form MC-053) is not current.  In particular, the Court notes that the next scheduled hearings for motions to compel discovery on January 9, 2023 are not reflected in the proposed order.

Therefore, Counsel shall lodge on or before December 19, 2022 for the Court’s review and approval of the revised MC-053 which provides all requisite information, including future hearings and proceedings noticed by any party, or ordered by the Court. Upon approval of the MC-053 by this Court, Counsel must serve the signed orders on Plaintiff and all other parties who have appeared in the action, within 10 days of the date of the Orders, and file proofs of service of such. Counsel will remain the attorney of record for Plaintiff until Counsel files the requisite proof of service. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1362(e).)