Judge: Michael E. Whitaker, Case: 21STCV46053, Date: 2023-04-27 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STCV46053 Hearing Date: April 27, 2023 Dept: 32
PLEASE NOTE: Parties are
encouraged to meet and confer concerning this tentative ruling to determine if
a resolution may be reached. If the
parties are unable to reach a resolution and a party intends to submit on this
tentative ruling, the party must send an email to the Court at sscdept32@lacourt.org indicating that party’s intention to submit. The email shall include the case number, date
and time of the hearing, counsel’s contact information (if applicable), and the
identity of the party submitting on this tentative ruling. If the Court does not receive an email
indicating the parties are submitting on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may place the motion off calendar or
adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court. If all parties do not submit on this
tentative ruling, they should arrange to appear in-person or remotely (which is
highly encouraged). Further, after the Court has posted/issued a tentative
ruling, the Court has the inherent authority to prohibit the withdrawal of the
subject motion and adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court.
TENTATIVE
RULING
DEPARTMENT |
32 |
HEARING DATE |
April
27, 2023 |
CASE NUMBER |
21STCV46053 |
MOTION |
Motion
to Compel Compliance with Subpoenas Duces Tecum; Request for Monetary
Sanctions |
MOVING PARTIES |
Defendants
Southern California Gas Company and Henry Campos |
OPPOSING PARTY |
None |
Defendants Southern California Gas
Company and Henry Campos (collectively, Defendants) move to compel the
Custodians of Records for Mani Chiropractic Corporation, Coronis Health, and
ProHealth Advanced Imaging (collectively, Deponents) to comply with the subpoenas
duces tecum served on Deponents, and to produce records as requested in the
subject subpoenas. Defendants also seek monetary
sanctions in connection with the motion.
Plaintiff has not filed an opposition.
Preliminarily, the Court notes that Defendants
have not advanced evidence to show that they personally served the subject
subpoenas on Deponents as required. (Code Civ.
Proc., § 2020.220, subd. (c)(2).) Here,
Defendants attached to the motion proofs of service which indicate that Mani
Chiropractic Corporation was served by mail.
Defendants did not attach proofs of service of the subpoenas pertaining
to Coronis Health and ProHealth Advanced Imaging, whether service was perfected
by mail or personal delivery. (See Declaration of Melissa A. Sandoval, ¶ 3,
Exhibit A.)
Accordingly, the Court denies Defendants’
motion as procedurally defective. Defendants
shall give notice of the Court’s ruling and file a proof of service of such.