Judge: Michael E. Whitaker, Case: 23SMCV04317, Date: 2024-01-08 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 23SMCV04317 Hearing Date: January 8, 2024 Dept: 207
TENTATIVE
RULING
| 
   DEPARTMENT  | 
  
   207  | 
 
| 
   HEARING DATE  | 
  
   January 8, 2024  | 
 
| 
   CASE NUMBER  | 
  
   23SMCV04317  | 
 
| 
   APPLICATION  | 
  
   Application to Be Admitted Pro Hac Vice  | 
 
| 
   MOVING PARTY  | 
  
   Defendant Einstein Noah Restaurant Group, Inc.  | 
 
| 
   OPPOSING PARTY  | 
  
   None  | 
 
APPLICATION
Timothy K. Masterson (“Applicant”) moves for a court order to appear
as counsel pro hac vice for Defendant Einstein Noah Restaurant Group, Inc.
(“Defendant”) in this action.  The
application is unopposed.
ANALYSIS
            California Rules of Court rule 9.40
provides that an attorney in good standing in another jurisdiction may apply to
appear as counsel pro hac vice in the State of California by filing a verified
application together with proof of service by mail of a copy of the application
and notice of hearing on all parties who have appeared in the case and on the
State Bar of California at its San Francisco office, with payment of a $50.00
fee, provided that the attorney is not a resident of the State of California,
and is not regularly engaged in substantial business, professional, or other
activities in the State of California. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 9.40.)
The application must state: (1) the applicant’s residence and office
addresses; (2) the courts to which the applicant has been admitted to practice
and the dates of admission; (3) that the applicant is a member of good standing
in those courts; (4) that the applicant is not currently suspended or disbarred
in any court; (5) the title of each court and cause in which the applicant has
filed an application to appear as counsel pro hac vice in this state in the
preceding two years, the date of each application, and whether or not it was
granted; and (6) the name, address, and telephone number of the active member
of the State Bar of California who is attorney of record in the local action.
(Cal. Rules of Court, rule 9.40(d).)
Here, the Masterson declaration states all of the above
information.  Further, the proof of
service indicates that the State Bar of California was served with the notice
and application via express mail, and the Deziel declaration indicates that the
$50 fee was paid to the State Bar.
Therefore, having satisfied all requirements, the Court grants Masterson’s
application to be admitted pro hac vice in this matter.
Defendant shall provide notice of the Court’s ruling and file a proof
of service regarding the same.
DATED: January 8, 2024                                                       ___________________________
Michael E. Whitaker
                                                                                          Judge
of the Superior Court