Judge: Michael E. Whitaker, Case: 24SMCV02543, Date: 2024-08-29 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 24SMCV02543 Hearing Date: August 29, 2024 Dept: 207
TENTATIVE
RULING
|
DEPARTMENT |
207 |
|
HEARING DATE |
August
29, 2024 |
|
CASE NUMBER |
24SMCV02543 |
|
MOTION |
Motion
to Be Admitted Pro Hac Vice |
|
MOVING PARTY |
Jennifer
B. Sokoler |
|
OPPOSING PARTY |
(none) |
MOTION
Jennifer B. Sokoler (“Counsel”) has filed an application to appear as
counsel pro hac vice for Defendants the University of California, Los Angeles
and The Regents of the University of California, Los Angeles
(“Defendants”). The application is
unopposed.
ANALYSIS
California Rules of Court rule 9.40
provides that an attorney in good standing in another jurisdiction may apply to
appear as counsel pro hac vice in the State of California by filing a verified
application together with proof of service by mail of a copy of the application
and notice of hearing on all parties who have appeared in the case and on the
State Bar of California at its San Francisco office, with payment of a $50.00
fee, so long as that attorney is not a resident of the State of California, and
is not regularly engaged in substantial business, professional, or other
activities in the State of California. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 9.40.)
The application must state: (1) the applicant’s residence and office
addresses; (2) the courts to which the applicant has been admitted to practice
and the dates of admission; (3) that the applicant is a member of good standing
in those courts; (4) that the applicant is not currently suspended or disbarred
in any court; (5) the title of each court and cause in which the applicant has
filed an application to appear as counsel pro hac vice in this state in the
preceding two years, the date of each application, and whether or not it was
granted; and (6) the name, address, and telephone number of the active member
of the State Bar of California who is attorney of record in the local action.
(Cal. Rules of Court, rule 9.40(d).)
The declarations of Counsel and of
Matthew R. Cowan include all of the above information. With
regard to notice to the State Bar, Cowan’s declaration indicates, “The State
Bar of California and all parties who have appeared in this matter are being
served with the Notice of Verified Application of UCLA for Non-Resident
Attorney Jennifer B. Sokoler to Appear Pro Hac Vice; Memorandum of Points and
Authorities; Verified Application of Jennifer B. Sokoler to Appear Pro Hac
Vice; and this Declaration of Matthew R. Cowan pursuant to the requirements of
California Rule of Court 9.40; and a Proposed Order.” (Cowan Decl. ¶ 3.)
However, Cowan’s statements are insufficient to demonstrate compliance with California Rules of Court,
Rule 9.40(c). Rule 9.40(c)(1)
provides: “A person desiring to appear
as counsel pro hac vice in a superior court must file with the court a verified
application together with proof of service by mail in accordance
with Code of Civil Procedure section 1013a of a copy of the application and of
the notice of hearing of the application on all parties who have
appeared in the cause and on the State Bar of California at its San Francisco
office. The notice of hearing must be given at the time prescribed in
Code of Civil Procedure section 1005 unless the court has prescribed a
shorter period.” (Cal. Rules of Court,
rule 9.40(c)(1), emphasis added.)
CONCLUSION AND ORDER
Therefore, the Court continues
the hearing on Counsel’s Application To Appear Pro Hac Vice to October 1, 2024
at 8:30 A.M. in Department 207. Counsel shall file a supplemental application,
with the requisite proof of service, demonstrating compliance with Rule 9.40 on
or before September 20, 2024.[1]
Counsel shall provide notice
of the Court’s ruling and file the notice with a proof of service forthwith.
DATED:
August 29, 2024 ___________________________
Michael E. Whitaker
[1] The Court notes that Defendants have filed two other
Applications to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice set for hearing on September 4,
2024. If Defendants opine that such
applications suffer from the same procedural defects as determined by the Court
herein, the Court will permit Defendants to reschedule the hearing on such
applications from September 4, 2024 to October 1, 2024 to ensure compliance
with Rule 9.40. And if the hearing is
continued to October 1, Defendants
shall file supplemental applications, with the requisite proofs of service,
demonstrating compliance with Rule 9.40 on or before September 20, 2024.