Judge: Michael P. Linfield, Case: 19STCV05264, Date: 2022-11-03 Tentative Ruling

The Court often posts its tentative several days in advance of the hearing. Please re-check the tentative rulings the day before the hearing to be sure that the Court has not revised the ruling since the time it was posted.

Please call the clerk at (213) 633-0154 by 4:00 pm. the court day before the hearing if you wish to submit on the tentative.


Case Number: 19STCV05264    Hearing Date: November 3, 2022    Dept: 34

SUBJECT:         Application and Order for Appearance and Examination

 

Moving Party:  Judgment Creditor Eduardo Guzman

Resp. Party:    None

                                     

       

The application and order for appearance and examination is DENIED.

 

BACKGROUND:

On February 13, 2019, Plaintiff Eduardo Guzman filed his Complaint against Defendants Gustavo Gutierrez, Optimum Growers, Inc., O.C. Multispecialty Surgery Center, Inc., and Bona Fide Ventures, LLC on causes of action related to breach of contract, fraud, and misrepresentation.

On May 4, 2021, the Court entered a Default Judgment for Plaintiff (now Judgement Creditor) against Eduardo Guzman (now Judgment Debtor)in the amount of $2,625,777.60.

On April 25, 2022, Judgment Creditor filed his Writ of Execution against Judgment Debtor.

On July 8, 2022, Judgment Creditor filed his Application and Order for Appearance and Examination against Judgment Debtor.

ANALYSIS:

 

I.           Legal Standard

 

Code of Civil Procedure section 708.120, subdivision (a) provides:

 

“Upon ex parte application by a judgment creditor who has a money judgment and proof by the judgment creditor by affidavit or otherwise to the satisfaction of the proper court that a third person has possession or control of property in which the judgment debtor has an interest or is indebted to the judgment debtor in an amount exceeding two hundred fifty dollars ($250), the court shall make an order directing the third person to appear before the court, or before a referee appointed by the court, at a time and place specified in the order, to answer concerning such property or debt. The affidavit in support of the judgment creditor's application may be based on the affiant's information and belief.”

 

“Not less than 10 days prior to the date set for examination, a copy of the order shall be: (1) Served personally to the third person[;] (2) Served personally or by mail on the judgment debtor.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 708.120, subd. (b).)

 

“An order made pursuant to subdivision (a) shall contain the following statements in 14-point boldface type if printed or in capital letters if typed:

 

. . .

 

(2) ‘NOTICE TO JUDGMENT DEBTOR. The person in whose favor the judgment was entered in this action claims that the person to be examined pursuant to this order has possession or control of property which is yours or owes you a debt. This property or debt is as follows: (Description of property or debt). If you claim that all or any portion of this property or debt is exempt from enforcement of the money judgment, you must file your exemption claim in writing with the court and personally serve a copy on the judgment creditor not later than three days before the date set for the examination. You must appear at the time and place set for this examination to establish your claim of exemption or your exemption may be waived.’” (Code Civ. Proc., § 708.120, subd. (e)(2).)

 

II.        Discussion

 

Judgment Creditor applies for an order for Judgment Debtor to appear for examination. (Application, ¶¶ 1, 4, 5.a.)

 

There is no evidence that Judgment Debtor was properly served because no proof of service relating to Judgment Debtor has been attached to the application or filed with the Court. (Code Civ. Proc., § 708.120, subd. (b).) Further, in the “Notice to Judgment Debtor” section of the application, Judgment Creditor fails to identify the property or debt that Judgment Debtor has possession or control over. (Code Civ. Proc., § 708.120, subd. (e)(2).)

 

 

III.     Conclusion

 

        The Court DENIES Judgment Creditor’s application and order for appearance and examination.