Judge: Michael P. Linfield, Case: 21STCV46412, Date: 2022-12-07 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STCV46412 Hearing Date: December 7, 2022 Dept: 34
SUBJECT: Verified
Application of Anthony J. D’Agostino to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice
Moving Party: Cross-Defendant/Cross-Complainant
General Star Indemnity Company
Resp. Party: None
SUBJECT: Verified
Application of David A. Wilford to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice
Moving Party: Cross-Defendant/Cross-Complainant
General Star Indemnity Company
Resp. Party: None
The
Verified Applications to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice are GRANTED.
BACKGROUND:
On
April 23, 2021, Plaintiffs Noah Meiner, Lennifer Hilliard, and Sandra Wilson
(“Meiner et al.”) filed their Complaint against Defendants Robin Amelia Sheehan,
Brian Morgan Heit, Matthew Jacob Feaver, and Heit Law Group (“Sheehan et al.”).
The underlying issue regards the alleged malpractice (and related claims) of
Sheehan et al. in Meiner et al.’s prior lawsuit on a specific e-spam law.
On
January 25, 2022, Sheehan et al. filed their Cross-Complaint against
Cross-Defendants Gregory Walston and Walston & Associates d.b.a. The Walson
Law Group (“Walston”).
On
April 21, 2022, Walston filed their Cross-Complaint against General Star
Insurance Company (actual name General Star Indemnity Company), Robin Amelia
Sheehan, Jay Fink, Noah Meiner, Lennifer Hilliard, and Sandra Wilson.
On
April 29, 2022, Walston filed their First Amended Cross-Complaint (FACC).
On
July 22, 2022, Cross-Defendant/Cross-Complainant General Star Indemnity Company
(“General Star”) filed its Cross-Complaint against Meiner et al., Sheehan et
al., and Walston.
On
October 18, 2022, General Star filed its Verified Application of David A.
Wilford to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice. General Star concurrently
filed its Proposed Order and subsequently on October 28, 2022 filed its Proof
of Service regarding this application.
On
October 28, 2022, General Star filed its Verified Application of Anthony J.
D’Agostino to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice. This application contained
a proof of service, and General Star concurrently filed its Proposed Order.
The
Verified Applications are unopposed.
ANALYSIS:
Applicants David A. Wilford and Anthony J.
D’Agostino seek admission to appear as counsel pro hac vice to represent Cross-Defendant/Cross-Complainant General Star Indemnity Company in this action, and to be associated as
co-counsel with David A. Tartaglio. Jeffrey N. Williams. (Wilford Verified
Application, ¶ 6; D’Agostino Verified Application, ¶ 6.)
Applicants are members in good standing of
the State of Illinois. Application Wilford is admitted to practice before the
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, and Application
D’Agostino is admitted to practice before the U.S. District Court for the
Northern District of Illinois, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh
Circuit, and the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.
(Wilford Verified Application, ¶¶ 2–3; D’Agostino Verified Application, ¶¶ 2–3.)
Applicant Wilford has not appeared pro hac
vice in California in the past two years, and Applicant D’Agostino has only
appeared pro hac vice in California
once in the past two years. (Wilford Verified Application, ¶ 5; D’Agostino
Verified Application, ¶ 5.) The applications also provide that the $50 fees
required to be admitted pro hac vice
have been paid to the State Bar of California. (Wilford Verified Application,
Ex. A; D’Agostino Verified Application, Ex. A.)
The proofs of service filed in support of these applications
demonstrate that service was made upon the State Bar at its San Francisco
address. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 9.40(c)(1).)
CONCLUSION:
The Court GRANTS the
Verified Application of David A. Wilford to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice
and the Verified Application of Anthony J. D’Agostino to Appear as Counsel Pro
Hac Vice.