Judge: Michael P. Linfield, Case: 22STCP02295, Date: 2022-12-23 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 22STCP02295    Hearing Date: December 23, 2022    Dept: 34

SUBJECT:         Motion for Assignment Order

 

Moving Party:  Judgment Creditor Ward and Smith, P.A.

Resp. Party:    None

                                     

       

The Motion for Assignment Order filed by Judgment Creditor Ward and Smith, P.A. on November 29, 2022, is GRANTED.

 

BACKGROUND:

On June 14, 2022, Judgment Creditor Ward and Smith, P.A. filed its Application for Entry of Judgment on Sister-State Judgment against Judgment Debtor Muzik, Inc.

On June 17, 2022, the Clerk’s Office issued the Court’s Judgment Based on Sister-State Judgment.

On November 29, 2022, Judgment Creditor filed its Motion for Assignment Order. Judgment Creditor concurrently filed its Proposed Order and Proof of Service.

Judgment Debtor has not filed an opposition or otherwise responded to the Motion.

ANALYSIS:

 

I.           Legal Standard

 

Code of Civil Procedure section 708.510, subdivision (a) states, in relevant part: 

 

“Except as otherwise provided by law, upon application of the judgment creditor on noticed motion, the court may order the judgment debtor to assign to the judgment creditor or to a receiver appointed pursuant to Article 7 (commencing with Section 708.610) all or part of a right to payment due or to become due, whether or not the right is conditioned on future developments, including but not limited to the following types of payments: 

 

(1) Wages dues from the federal government that are not subject to withholding under an earnings withholding order. 

(2) Rents. 

(3) Commissions.  

(4) Royalties. 

(5) Payments due from a patent or copyright. 

(6) Insurance policy loan value.”

 

Code of Civil Procedure section 708.510, subdivision (c), further provides:  

 

“[I]n determining whether to order an assignment or the amount of an assignment pursuant to subdivision (a), the court may take into consideration all relevant factors, including the following: 

 

(1) The reasonable requirements of a judgment debtor who is a natural person and of persons supported in whole or in part by the judgment debtor. 

(2) Payments the judgment debtor is required to make or that are deducted in satisfaction of other judgments and wage assignments, including earnings assignment orders for support. 

(3) The amount remaining due on the money judgment. 

(4) The amount being or to be received in satisfaction of the right to payment that may be assigned.

 

Code of Civil Procedure section 708.520, subdivision (a) states, in relevant part: “When an application is made pursuant to Section 708.510 or thereafter, the judgment creditor may apply to the court for an order restraining the judgment debtor from assigning or otherwise disposing of the right to payment that is sought to be assigned.” “The court may issue an order pursuant to this section upon a showing of need for the order.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 708.520, subdivision (b).) 

II.        Discussion

 

Judgment Creditor move the Court for an order assigning to Judgment Creditor the Judgment Debtor’s monies due, which are or may be processed through the following Obligors:

 

(1)       Amazon.com, Inc.;

(2)       American Express Company;

(3)       Apple Pay/Apple, Inc.;

(4)       Diners Club International;

(5)       Discover Bank;

(6)       Google Pay/Google;

(7)       JCB Co., Ltd.;

(8)       Discover;

(9)       Master Card;

(10)    Paypal Holdings, Inc.;

(11)    Shop Pay and/or Shopify;

(12)    Venmo; and

(13)    Visa.

 

(Motion, pp. 5–6 and Ex. D.)

 

Among other things, Judgment Creditor’s Counsel declares that, after an investigation, Counsel determined that Judgment Debtor sells its products via its website, accepts payments from its customers in various forms and thus likely receives payments from various payment processors, and that the Judgment Debtor has rights to payments now due or to become due from the Obligors listed above. (Motion, Dec. Roza, ¶¶ 3–4.) Counsel attaches websites showing Judgment Debtor’s website and the various payment methods that Judgment Debtor accepts online for sale of its products. (Id. at Ex. A.)

 

This evidence sufficiently demonstrates that the Judgment Debtor may be due money from the abovementioned entities that can be assigned to satisfy the Judgment entered in this action. In addition, Judgment Creditor has included a proof of service with this motion that demonstrates Judgment Debtor was served by mail with this motion pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 684.020.

 

The Motion for Assignment Order filed by Judgment Creditor Ward and Smith, P.A. on November 29, 2022, is GRANTED.