Judge: Michael P. Linfield, Case: 22STCV13168, Date: 2023-07-21 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV13168 Hearing Date: July 21, 2023 Dept: 34
SUBJECT: Motion to Set
Aside Request for Dismissal
Moving Party: Plaintiff
Maha Moqaddem
Resp. Party: None
Plaintiff’s Motion to Set Aside Request for
Dismissal is DENIED without prejudice.
BACKGROUND:
On April 20, 2022, Plaintiff Maha Moqaddem filed her Complaint against
Defendant Jill Janotta on causes of action arising from Defendant’s
representation as her public defender.
On September 28, 2022, by request of
Plaintiff, the Clerk’s Office dismissed the Complaint without prejudice.
On
June 23, 2023, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Set Aside Request for Dismissal.
No opposition or
other response has been filed to the Motion.
ANALYSIS:
I.
Legal Standard
“The court may, upon any terms as may be just, relieve a party or his
or her legal representative from a judgment, dismissal, order, or other
proceeding taken against him or her through his or her mistake, inadvertence,
surprise, or excusable neglect. Application for this relief shall be accompanied
by a copy of the answer or other pleading proposed to be filed therein,
otherwise the application shall not be granted, and shall be made within a
reasonable time, in no case exceeding six months, after the judgment,
dismissal, order, or proceeding was taken. . . . No affidavit or declaration of
merits shall be required of the moving party. Notwithstanding any other
requirements of this section, the court shall, whenever an application for
relief is made no more than six months after entry of judgment, is in proper
form, and is accompanied by an attorney’s sworn affidavit attesting to his or
her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or neglect, vacate any (1) resulting
default entered by the clerk against his or her client, and which will result
in entry of a default judgment, or (2) resulting default judgment or dismissal
entered against his or her client, unless the court finds that the default or
dismissal was not in fact caused by the attorney’s mistake, inadvertence,
surprise, or neglect. . . .” (Code Civ. Proc., § 473, subd. (b).)
“Unless otherwise ordered or specifically provided by law, all moving
and supporting papers shall be served and filed at least 16 court days before
the hearing. The moving and supporting papers served shall be a copy of the papers
filed or to be filed with the court. . . .” (Code Civ. Proc., § 1005, subd.
(b).)
II.
Discussion
A.
The
Parties’ Arguments
Plaintiff moves the Court to: (1) set
aside the dismissal of her Complaint; and (2) proceed with the case. (Motion,
p. 1 and Decl. Moqaddem, ¶ 5.)
Plaintiff argues: (1) that the issues
underlying this action remained even after Plaintiff dismissed the case; (2)
that Plaintiff continues to suffer from Defendant’s conduct; and (3) there is
no final dismissal order in this case. (Motion, p. 1:18–25 and Decl. Moqaddem,
¶¶ 2–4.)
No opposition or other response has been
filed to the Motion.
B.
Discussion
1.
The
Motion to Vacate Lacks a Proof of Service
Plaintiff did not attach a proof of service to her
Motion, nor did Plaintiff separately file a proof of service regarding the
Motion. The Court is not aware of an attempt by Plaintiff to serve Defendant
with the Motion, and Plaintiff has not otherwise indicated to
the Court that Defendant has notice of the Motion.
Plaintiff is required to serve Defendant in order to
move the Court for the relief she seeks. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1005, subd. (b).) This is
in the interest of fairness to allow Defendant an opportunity to oppose,
accept, or otherwise respond to the Motion.
The
Court DENIES without prejudice the Motion for failure to serve the Motion on
the opposing party.
2.
Other Concerns
about the Motion to Vacate
The Court notes two other issues with
the Motion. These issues are not necessary for the resolution of today’s motion
but might become important should Plaintiff file another motion to vacate the
dismissal.
First, a Motion for relief pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section
473, subdivision (b) must “be accompanied by a copy of the answer or other
pleading proposed to be filed therein, otherwise the application shall not be
granted[.]” Plaintiff did not attach such a filing.
Second, more than six months elapsed since the dismissal was entered.
Accordingly, the Court now lacks jurisdiction to set aside the dismissal. (Code
Civ. Proc., § 473, subd. (b).) Plaintiff has not cited any other grounds upon
which the Court may set aside the dismissal.
III.
Conclusion
Plaintiff’s Motion to Set Aside Request for
Dismissal is DENIED without prejudice.