Judge: Michael P. Linfield, Case: 23STCV05211, Date: 2023-11-14 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 23STCV05211 Hearing Date: November 14, 2023 Dept: 34
SUBJECT: Motion to be
Relieved as Counsel
Moving Party: Plaintiff’s
Counsel John Gibson
Resp. Party: None
The Motion to be Relieved as Counsel is GRANTED.
BACKGROUND:
On March 9,
2023, Plaintiff Sailing Supply Chain (HK) Co., Ltd. filed its Complaint against
Defendants Smart Transit Solutions, Inc. and Corey Norwood on causes of action
for unlawful conversion and fraud.
On October
11, 2023, Plaintiff’s Counsel, John Gibson, filed: (1) MC-051, Motion to be
Relieved as Counsel; (2) MC-052, Declaration; (3) MC-053, Proposed Order; and
(4) Proof of Service.
No opposition
or other response has been filed to the Motion.
ANALYSIS:
I.
Legal Standard
An attorney moving to be relieved as counsel under California Code of
Civil Procedure section 284(2) must meet the requirements set out in California
Rules of Court, rule 3.1362.
To comply with rule 3.1362, the moving party must submit the following
forms: (1) Notice of Motion and Motion to be Relieved as Counsel; (2)
Declaration in Support of Attorney's Motion to be Relieved as Counsel; and (3)
Order Granting Attorney's Motion to be Relieved as Counsel. (Cal. Rules of
Court, rule 3.1362(a), (c), (e).)
The moving party must serve the aforementioned forms on the client and
all other parties who have appeared in the case. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule
3.1362(d).) Further, when the client is served by mail, the attorney's
declaration must show that the client's address was confirmed within the last
30 days and how it was confirmed. (Id.)
Absent a showing of resulting prejudice, an attorney’s request for
withdrawal should be granted. (People v. Prince (1968) 268 Cal.App.2d
398, 406.)
II.
Discussion
Counsel’s Motion to be Relieved as Counsel complies with all of the
requirements of California Rules of Court, rule 3.1362, in that Counsel
provided notice of motion and motion to be relieved as counsel, a proposed
order granting attorney’s motions to be relieved as counsel, and a declaration
in support of the motion to be relieved as counsel.
The declaration states that there has been a breakdown in the
attorney-client relationship and that it has been several months since
Plaintiff’s Counsel has had any response from Plaintiff, despite Plaintiff’s
Counsels emails and calls.
As trial is not scheduled in this matter, there does not be a
significant risk of prejudice to Plaintiff by the withdrawal. Further, it is
not Plaintiff’s Counsel’s responsibility to prosecute this matter.
III. Conclusion
The Motion to be Relieved as Counsel is GRANTED.