Judge: Michael Shultz, Case: 20STCV02062, Date: 2024-04-02 Tentative Ruling

INSTRUCTIONS: If the parties wish to submit on the tentative ruling and avoid a court appearance on the matter, the moving party must:

1. Contact the opposing party and all other parties who have appeared in the action and confirm that each will submit on the tentative ruling.

2. No later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing, call the Courtroom (310-761-4302) advising that all parties will submit on the tentative ruling and waive hearing; and

3. Serve notice of the Court's ruling on all parties entitled to receive service.

If this procedure is followed, when the case is called the Court will enter its ruling on the motion in accordance with its tentative ruling. If any party declines to submit on the tentative ruling, then no telephone call is necessary, and all parties should appear at the hearing. If there is neither a telephone call nor an appearance, then the matter may either be taken off calendar or ruled on. 

TENTATIVE RULINGS -- http://www.lacourt.org/tentativeRulingNet/ui/main.aspx?casetype=civil




Case Number: 20STCV02062    Hearing Date: April 2, 2024    Dept: A

20STCV02062 Edwin Nolasco, by and through his Guardian ad Litem, Ana Lloyd v. Los Angeles Unified School District; Doe 1

Tuesday, April 2, 2024 at 8:30 a.m.

 

[TENTATIVE] ORDER CONTINUING THE HEARING ON PETITION FOR COMPROMISE OF A DISPUTED CLAIM OF A PERSON WITH A DISABILITY                                                                                                                                                           

 

  I.      BACKGROUND

      Claimant, Edwin Nolasco, by and through his sister and Guardian ad Litem, Ana Lloyd, settled his claims arising from multiple incidents of sexual assault perpetrated by Defendant, Doe 1. Claimant was 21 years old at the time and attending classes provided by Los Angeles Unified School District (“LAUSD”) at Banneker Career and Transition Center (“Banneker”). (FAC, ¶ 2-3. 

      Claimant has settled his claims against LAUSD for $380,000 to be disbursed as follows:

DISBURSEMENTS FROM SETTLEMENT

 

 

Gross settlement

 

$380,000.00

Medi-Cal lien

$186.50

 

Attorney’s fees (33 1/3%)

126,666.66

 

costs

64,532.26

 

Total disbursements

 

$191,385.42

Net settlement to Claimant

 

$188,614.58

 

DISTRIBUTION OF NET SETTLEMENT

$188,614.58

Fund annuity

-165,000.00

Transfer to Guardian for “immediate necessities”

-23,614.58

 

($   0.00)

 

      A claimant’s settlement is valid if approved by the court after a hearing.  (Prob. Code, §§3505, 3500.) Claimant Nolasco has suffered permanent injuries as a result of the alleged attacks. Counsel is required to provide “an original or a photocopy of any doctor's report containing a diagnosis of the claimant's injuries or a prognosis for the claimant's recovery, and a report of the claimant's current condition, must be attached to this petition as Attachment 8. A new report is not necessary if a previous report accurately describes the claimant's current condition.” (Petition ¶ 8.)

      Counsel proposes to deposit into his trust account $215,000 from which Counsel intends to pay the Medi-Cal lien and to distribute $23,614.58 to the Guardian ad Litem. The amount of the net settlement that can be transferred to the Guardian ad Litem is limited to $5,000.00. (Prob. Code, § 3611 subd. (e). The Court has discretion to order that all or part of the money, not exceeding $20,000, be held on any other conditions the Court determines is in the Claimant’s best interest. (Prob. Code § 3611 subd. (f).) Alternatively, the Court can order deposit of $23,614.58 into a blocked account for the benefit of Claimant.

      The Court will hear from the parties as to the proposed transfer of funds directly to the Guardian. The proposed order should be amended to reflect that checks will be issued in the following manner:

1)      A check for counsel’s fees and costs totaling $191,198.92.

2)      A check to Medi-Cal for $186.50.      

3)      A check to New York Life Insurance Company for $165,000 to fund the annuity.

4)      A copy of the terms of the annuity and schedule shall be attached to the proposed order.

5)      An order for distribution of the balance of $23,614.58 into a blocked account for the benefit of the Claimant (or as otherwise ordered at the hearing).

      The hearing is continued to May 9. 2024, at 9:00 a.m. Petitioner is ordered to provide a supplemental declaration that includes a doctor’s report as reference above, and an amended proposed order.