Judge: Michael Shultz, Case: 21CMCV00075, Date: 2022-08-04 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 21CMCV00075    Hearing Date: August 4, 2022    Dept: A

21CMCV00075 Anne-Marie Molina v. Malvin Mallari, County of Los Angeles

Thursday, August 4, 2022 at 8:30 a.m.

 

[TENTATIVE] ORDER TAKING OFF CALENDAR DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH DEPOSITION SUBPOENA FOR PRODUCTION OF BUSINESS RECORDS AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS

 

            The Second Amended Complaint filed on November 12, 2021, alleges that Defendant, County of Los Angeles (“County”) employed Plaintiff and Defendant, Malvin Mallari (“Mallari”). Plaintiff alleges that Mallari made sexual advances toward Plaintiff and threatened to demote her when she complained. Plaintiff alleges claims for hostile work environment against both Defendants and failure to prevent harassment against Defendant County.                 

            On July 8, 2022, County filed this motion to compel a non-party witness, Janis Powell, LCSW, to comply with a subpoena for business records purportedly served on the witness on April 7, 2022. Plaintiff disclosed in her discovery responses that she sought therapy from the witness. Motion, Ex. B, page 6. County argues that although Plaintiff signed a consent for the release of her therapist’s records, the witness refuses to comply or communicate with defense counsel. Declaration of Irene Yousefi, ¶ 7-9.

            Service of a subpoena for production of documents on a nonparty witness must be made personally. Code Civ. Proc., § 1987(a). Defendant has not provided an affidavit of such service describing the date, time, and manner of service on the witness. Additionally, there is no evidence that the witness was personally served with this motion. A written notice and all moving papers supporting a motion to compel production of a document or tangible thing from a nonparty deponent “must be personally served on the nonparty deponent unless the nonparty deponent agrees to accept service by mail at an address specified on the deposition record.” Cal Rules of Court, Rule 3.1346. The proof of service attached to the motion indicates that only the parties were served by mail with the motion.

            Therefore, the motion is TAKEN OFF CALENDAR for defective service.