Judge: Michael Shultz, Case: 22CMCV00340, Date: 2023-11-02 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 22CMCV00340    Hearing Date: February 1, 2024    Dept: A

22CMCV00340 City of Compton v. San Pedro Mo, et al.

Thursday, February 1, 2024, at 8:30 a.m.

 

[TENTATIVE] ORDER APPROVING THE RECEIVER’S FINAL REPORT AND ACCOUNT FILED NOVEMBER 22, 2023.

 

I.        BACKGROUND

       The complaint filed on September 28, 2022, alleges that Defendant, San Pedro Mo, LLC, (“San Pedro”) whose manager is Mikel Haghnazarzadeh, owns real property in San Pedro. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants are operating an unlicensed marijuana business at the property. Plaintiff alleges claims for abatement, nuisance, for various Code violations, and related statutory violations. On July 7, 2023, the Court appointed Theodore Lanes as receiver (“Receiver”) to take possession of the property and abate the nuisance.

       On November 2, 2023, the Court heard the Receiver’s motion for order (1) permitting issuance of a reporter’s certificate, (2) to approve a listing agreement, and to (3) authorize appointment of receiver’s counsel. The Court granted the first and third requests and denied the second request to approve a listing agreement until this motion could be heard. The Receiver was ordered to cease any further work. (M.O. filed 11/2/23.)

II.      ARGUMENTS

       Defendants contend the court should terminate the receivership since the Receiver ended the operation of the marijuana dispensary at the property. The Receiver changed the locks and relieved the security detail. The only issue is the presentation of the Receiver’s invoices for the Court’s approval.

       Plaintiff contends the receivership should not be terminated because Defendants lacked diligence in attempting to evict the tenants conducting the business since Plaintiff issued its first citation on May 21, 2020. There is a strong likelihood that Defendants will continue its prior unlawful use of the property if the receivership is terminated. The Court’s electronic file does not reflect that Defendants filed a reply brief.

III.    DISCUSSION

       The Court originally heard this motion on November 14, 2023, and GRANTED the Defendants’ motion to terminate the receivership and ordered reimbursement of the Receiver’s fees and costs incurred. The Court reserved Defendants’ right to object to the final accounting of the Receiver’s report. (M.O filed 11/14/23.)

       The Court has considered Defendants’ objections to the Receiver’s Final Report and Accounting filed November 29, 2023, objecting to the fees incurred for security and the receiver’s attorney’s fees of $19,306.15, to which Defendants object as excessive and unnecessary. The Court has also considered the declaration of Oren Bitan and the Receiver’s reply thereto filed January 11, 2024, in support of attorney’s fees and costs.

       The Court finds that the hiring of security was necessarily and reasonably incurred given the ongoing threat of return of the prior operators of the business. The declaration of Oren Bitan substantiates that the fees incurred were reasonable and necessary.

       Accordingly, Defendants’ objections thereto are overruled.

IV.    CONCLUSION

       Based on the foregoing, the Court approves the Receiver’s Final Report and Account for reimbursements in the amounts as reported.