Judge: Michael Shultz, Case: 24CMCV00508, Date: 2024-08-27 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 24CMCV00508    Hearing Date: August 27, 2024    Dept: A

24CMCV00508 Sydney Baek v. LASUPPORTIVEHOUSING, LLC

 

 Tuesday, August 27, 2024

 

[TENTATIVE] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFAULT JUDGMENT

 

 

I.        BACKGROUND

       This action arises from Defendant’s alleged breach of a written lease agreement for four different parcels of residential real property. Plaintiff alleges $288,804 in damages for Defendant’s alleged failure to pay rent. The clerk entered defendant against Defendant, LA SupportiveHousing, LLC on June 16, 2024.

       Plaintiff does not allege sufficient facts to support the foundation or authenticity of the business records submitted. The complaint alleges principal damages of $288,804.00. (Complaint 4:18-19.) However, Plaintiff’s “Damage History Note” shows principal damages for unpaid rent and repairs totaling $281,221.00. (Ex. 2, .pdf 16.)

       Plaintiff requests expenses for repair and cleaning totaling $55,183 (Baek decl., ¶ 19). However, the sum of all invoices is $46,483.00 (Baek Decl., Ex. 3.)

 

Invoice 2007

11164 repair/replace and repair

9940

2/17/23

11164 ½  repair/replace

9750

4/2/23

11166    repair/replace

9300

12/5/22

11166 ½  repaint

10,000

2/16/23

11164 ½  rekey

165

2/28/23

11164 ½  install refrigerator/Stove

750

2/16/23

11164 ½  security

1200

12/30/22

11164    security for 26 days

2500

5/12/22

Security

2600

3/22/23

11166 & 11166 ½ new keys and locks

278

 

TOTAL

46,483

 

       Additionally, Invoice # 2007 was submitted twice. While Plaintiff mentions recovery of attorney fees, there is no discussion of the basis for its calculation, nor is it separately accounted for in the proposed judgment (Baek decl., ¶ 21.) Costs of $635 are established.

       Plaintiff collected $10,000 for a security deposit. (Lease, Ex. 1, ¶ 4.A.) The landlord may recover reasonably necessary amounts to “remedy tenant defaults in the payment of rent, to repair damages to the premises caused by the tenant, or to clean the premises upon termination of the tenancy, if the payment or deposit is made for any or all of those specific purposes." (Civ. Code, § 1950.5; (a); Civ. Code, § 1950.7(c).) Declarant Baek does not account for the security deposit and whether it was applied to the back rent, cleaning, or repairs.  

       Accordingly, the hearing on Plaintiff’s request for court judgment is continued for Plaintiff to submit a supplemental declaration supporting the submission of the business records, a calculation of damages supported by invoices and receipts, allocation of the security deposit, evidence to support principal damages and a re-calculation of principal damages, for back rent damages for repairs/cleaning. If attorney’s fees were sought, Plaintiff is ordered to explain the basis for such fees, its calculation, and apply it separately in the proposed judgment where indicated.

       The hearing is continued to October 31, 2024 at 8:30 a.m. in Department A of the Compton Courthouse. Plaintiff is ordered to provide a supplemental declaration discussing the foregoing discrepancies at least 10 court days before the hearing.