Judge: Michael Shultz, Case: 24STCV06858, Date: 2025-05-20 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 24STCV06858 Hearing Date: May 20, 2025 Dept: 40
24STCV06858
Tuesday, May 20, 2025
[TENTATIVE] ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR
COURT JUDGMENT AND DISMISSING CASE
This
unlawful detainer action arises from the alleged breach of a written commercial
lease agreement. Plaintiff alleges Defendant failed to pay rent totaling
$53,606.88 plus reasonable rental value of $297.81 per day. Plaintiff served a
three-day notice to pay rent or quit on March 8, 2024. The clerk entered
Defendant’s default on April 22, 2024. All DOE defendants have been dismissed.
The
court continued this matter from March 3, 2025, for Plaintiff to substantiate
damages with documentary evidence and to provide a declaration asserting foundational
facts necessary to support a business records exception to the hearsay rule.
(Evid. Code, §1271, [requiring facts to establish that the writing was made in
the regular course of business, at or near the time of the act, by a custodian
or other qualified witness testifying to its identity and mode of preparation
and indicate its trustworthiness.].)
Plaintiff
was given an opportunity to cure the defect identified by the Court on March 3,
2025, and Plaintiff failed. While Plaintiff
submitted evidence proving damage, Plaintiff submitted the same declaration
without complying with Evidence Code § 1271.
Accordingly,
the court DENIES Plaintiff’s request for a default judgment. Having submitted incompetent
evidence on two occasions and being unable to cure the defect, the Court dismisses
the action.
.