Judge: Michael Shultz, Case: 24STCV10531, Date: 2024-11-14 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 24STCV10531    Hearing Date: November 14, 2024    Dept: 40

24STCV10531 Ana Maria Caldwell, a Trustee of the Ana Maria Caldwell Revocable Trust v. Iris Maria Caldwell, a Trustee of the Iris M. Caldwell Trust

 

Thursday, November 14, 2024

 

TENTATIVE ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT FOR PARTITION BY SALE AND APPOINTMENT OF REFEREE

 

      This is an action to partition real property in which the parties own an undivided one-half interest as tenants in common. The clerk entered default against Defendant on August 23, 2024.   

      Plaintiff is entitled to partition real property as a co-owner. (Code Civ. Proc., § 872.210.) Partition as to concurrent interest in the property “shall be as of right unless barred by a valid waiver.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 872.710 subd. (b).)    

      In issuing an interlocutory judgment for partition, the trial court must determine “the parties’ interests in the property and issue an order granting the partition. (§ 872.720, subd. (a).) Second, the manner of partition—i.e., a physical division or sale of the property—is to be decided when or after the parties’ ownership interests are determined, but not before. (Summers v. Superior Court (2018) 24 Cal.App.5th 138, 143.)

      Plaintiff submits a recorded deed transferring her 50 percent interest to her revocable trust. (Ex. 1.) Defendant also transferred her 50 percent interest to her revocable trust. (Ex. 2.)

      If the court finds that the plaintiff is entitled to partition, the court “shall make an interlocutory judgment that determines the interests of the parties in the property and orders the partition of the property, and unless it is to be later determined, the manner of partition.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 872.720(a).)

      The court “shall appoint a referee to divide or sell the property as ordered by the court.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 873.010.) The referee may perform any acts necessary to exercise the authority conferred by statute or Court order. (Code Civ. Proc., § 873.060.)

      Plaintiff nominates Matthew L. Taylor whose declaration and curriculum vitae are attached to the motion. The court has discretion to order the referee to post a bond. (Code Civ. Proc., § 873.010 subd. (b)(1).) Plaintiff asserts that a $5,000 bond will be posted within four days of the judgment being entered. (Mot. p. 11.)  The proposed judgment, however, does not include this language.

      The manner of sale and the scope of the referee’s power and authority are provided for in the proposed judgment. Any encumbrance is to be satisfied from the proceeds of sale. The referee will manage the property, including demanding and collecting market rents and is authorized to take possession. Sale will be conducted upon the court’s approval and confirmation.

      Based on the foregoing, and after hearing from the parties, the court is inclined to GRANT the Request for Interlocutory Judgment.  Plaintiff is ordered to include language in the proposed judgment that the referee will post a $5,000 bond. The Referee is ordered to file his first report for approval as contemplated in the proposed judgment by ______________________________. (Prop. Judg. ¶ 1.)