Judge Michelle C. Kim, Case 18STCV01944 2023-03-15 Tentative Ruling

Judge: Michelle C. Kim, Case: 18STCV01944, Date: 2023-03-15 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 18STCV01944 Hearing Date: March 15, 2023 Dept: 31

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT

MARY LIM,

Plaintiff(s),

vs.

CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ET AL.,

Defendant(s).

)

CASE NO: 18STCV01944

[TENTATIVE] ORDER TAKING MOTION – OTHER PROOF OF SERVICE OFF CALENDAR

Dept. 31

1:30 p.m.

March 15, 2023

The Court’s records show that a Hearing on Motion – other proof of service was scheduled for hearing in this matter for March 15, 2023. However, to date, no such motion has been filed in this action with a noticed hearing date for March 15, 2023.[1]

Therefore, the Hearing on Motion – other proof of service is taken off calendar.

Plaintiff is ordered to give notice.

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE:

Parties are encouraged to meet and confer after reading this tentative ruling to see if they can reach an agreement.
If a party intends to submit on this tentative ruling, the party must send an email to the Court at sscdept31@lacourt.org with the Subject line “SUBMIT” followed by the case number. The body of the email must include the hearing date and time, counsel’s contact information, and the identity of the party submitting.
Unless all parties submit by email to this tentative ruling, the parties should arrange to appear remotely (encouraged) or in person for oral argument. You should assume that others may appear at the hearing to argue.
If the parties neither submit nor appear at hearing, the Court may take the motion off calendar or adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court. After the Court has issued a tentative ruling, the Court may prohibit the withdrawal of the subject motion without leave.

Dated this 15^th day of March 2023

Hon. Audra Mori

Judge of the Superior Court

[1] The most recent motion filed in this action was filed by Plaintiff on November 18, 2022, and captioned, “Motion to Vacate/Set Aside Order to Dismiss Default Entry.” There is no proof of service attached to the motion, and it contains a noticed hearing date for November 30, 2022. No notice of continuance has otherwise been filed providing that the motion has been rescheduled with proof of service on all parties that have appeared.