Judge: Michelle C. Kim, Case: 19STCV00950, Date: 2023-04-14 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 19STCV00950    Hearing Date: April 14, 2023    Dept: 31

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT

 

REGINE INGRAM, ET AL,

                        Plaintiffs,

            vs.

 

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, ET AL.,

 

                        Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

      CASE NO: 19STCV00950

 

[TENTATIVE] ORDER CONTINUING MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER VERIFIED RESPONSES TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET TWO

 

Dept. 31

1:30 p.m.

April 14, 2023

 

Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories, set two, is premature and will be continued to a new date as set forth below.  While an Informal Discovery Conference (“IDC”) was held on September 21, 2022, that IDC concerned further discovery as to Plaintiffs’ Form Interrogatories, set one, and Special Interrogatories, set one. (See Min. Order, Sept. 21, 2022; see also IDC Form, Sept. 1, 2022.) Thus, the parties are ordered to participate in an Informal Discovery Conference (“IDC”) regarding any additional discovery as required by the Court’s Standing Order Re: PI Court Procedures, which is available on the LA Superior Court’s website, under the Personal Injury section.

 

 The hearing on the MTCF is continued to July 27, 2023 1:30 p.m. in Department 31 of the Spring Street Courthouse.  Moving Party is ordered to use the online reservation management system to schedule an IDC, which must go forward per the terms set forth in the Standing Order.  Moving Party is ordered to use the online reservation management system to schedule an IDC, which must go forward per the terms set forth in the 2/24/20 Standing Order.  The IDC must be scheduled at least two weeks prior to the continued hearing date on the MTCF.  

 

If the above date is not convenient for the parties and/or an IDC cannot be scheduled, for whatever reason, within the necessary time period, Moving Party must use the online reservation system to promptly continue the hearing on the motion to a date at least two weeks after the IDC.

 

The court is hopeful the hearing on the MTCF will not be necessary.  If the parties are unable to resolve all outstanding issues at the IDC, the parties must submit a joint statement of items in dispute at least two weeks prior to the continued hearing date.  The joint statement must be a single document, with analysis by both parties, addressing each remaining issue. 

 

Plaintiffs are ordered to give notice. 

 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: 

 

Dated this 14th  day of April, 2023

 

 

 

 

Hon. Michelle C. Kim

Judge of the Superior Court