Judge: Michelle C. Kim, Case: 19STCV00950, Date: 2023-05-11 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 19STCV00950 Hearing Date: May 11, 2023 Dept: 31
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS
ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
|
Plaintiffs,
vs. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION,
ET AL., Defendants. |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE] ORDER CONTINUING
MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER VERIFIED RESPONSES TO DEMANDS FOR PRODUCTION, SET
TWO Dept. 31 1:30 p.m. May 11, 2023 |
Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel
Further Responses to Demands for Production, set two, is premature and will be
continued to a new date as set forth below.
While an Informal Discovery Conference (“IDC”) was held on September 21,
2022, that IDC concerned further discovery as to Plaintiffs’ Form
Interrogatories, set one, and Special Interrogatories, set one. (See Min.
Order, Sept. 21, 2022; see also IDC Form, Sept. 1, 2022.) Thus, the parties are
ordered to participate in an Informal Discovery Conference (“IDC”) regarding
any additional discovery as required by the Court’s Standing Order Re: PI Court
Procedures, which is available on the LA Superior Court’s website, under the
Personal Injury section.
The hearing on the MTCF is continued to July
27, 2023 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 31 of the Spring Street Courthouse. Moving Party is ordered to use the online
reservation management system to schedule an IDC, which must go forward per the
terms set forth in the Standing Order. The IDC must be scheduled at least two
weeks prior to the continued hearing date on the MTCF.
If the above date is not convenient
for the parties and/or an IDC cannot be scheduled, for whatever reason, within
the necessary time period, Moving Party must use the online reservation system
to promptly continue the hearing on the motion to a date at least two weeks
after the IDC.
The court is hopeful the hearing on
the MTCF will not be necessary. If the
parties are unable to resolve all outstanding issues at the IDC, the parties
must submit a joint statement of items in dispute at least two weeks prior to
the continued hearing date. The joint
statement must be a single document, with analysis by both parties, addressing
each remaining issue.
Plaintiffs are ordered to give
notice.
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE:
Dated this 11th
day of May, 2023
|
|
|
|
|
Hon. Michelle
C. Kim Judge
of the Superior Court |