Judge: Michelle C. Kim, Case: 19STCV23537, Date: 2023-05-04 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 19STCV23537 Hearing Date: May 4, 2023 Dept: 31
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
|
Plaintiff(s), vs. METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY, ET AL., Defendant(s). | ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: HEARING ON MOTIONS TO COMPEL FURTHER Dept. 31 1:30 p.m. May 4, 2023 |
Defendant Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s motions to compel further responses to form interrogatories, set one, and request for production of documents, set one, are premature and will be continued to a new date as set forth below. The parties are ordered to participate in an Informal Discovery Conference (“IDC”) as required by the Court’s Standing Order Re: PI Court Procedures, which is available on the LA Superior Court’s website, under the Personal Injury section.
The Eighth Amended Standing Order provides, “PI Hub Courts may deny or continue a Motion to Compel Further Responses to Discovery unless the parties have participated in an IDC before the scheduled hearing on a motion to compel further discovery responses.” Defendant must use the Court’s Reservation System to continue the hearing date on the motions and schedule an IDC. The IDC must be scheduled at least two weeks prior to the continued hearing date on the motion.
If Defendant fails to continue the motions, the Court may deny or take the motions off calendar.
The Court is hopeful the hearing on the motions will not be necessary. If the parties are unable to resolve all outstanding issues at the IDC, the parties must submit a joint statement of items in dispute at least two weeks prior to the continued hearing date. The joint statement must be a single document, with analysis by both parties, addressing each remaining issue.
Defendant is ordered to give notice.
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE:
Dated this 4th day of May 2023
| |
Hon. Michelle C. Kim Judge of the Superior Court |