Judge: Michelle C. Kim, Case: 20STCV24440, Date: 2023-05-25 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 20STCV24440 Hearing Date: May 25, 2023 Dept: 31
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS
ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
Plaintiff,
vs. HARRY HO YEN AHN, ET AL., Defendant(s). |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE] ORDER CONTINUING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Dept. 31 1:30 p.m. May 25, 2023 |
Plaintiff, Eun Hee So, filed this
action against Defendants Harry Ho Yen Ahn and Grace S. Ahn, individually, and
as trustees of the Ahn Family Trust, PMD & Company, and Does 1-50 alleging
causes of action for negligence and premises liability. The complaint alleges
that Defendants negligently maintained a staircase on their premises. The
staircase allegedly was poorly lit, and the steps were unmarked, causing
Plaintiff to slip and sustain injuries.
Defendants, Harry Ho Yen Ahn and
Grace S. Ahn, individually, and as Trustees of The Ahn Family Trust (“Defendants”)
now move for summary judgment. Plaintiff
opposes the motion, and Defendants have filed a reply.
The Court CONTINUES the matter to
allow for the parties to correct the following deficiencies.
Defendants’
Separate Statement is missing the reference to the exhibit number and proper
title, and thus fails to conform with the California Rules of Court, rule
3.1350. “The supporting papers shall include a separate statement setting forth
plainly and concisely all material facts that the moving party contends are
undisputed. Each of the material facts stated shall be followed by a reference
to the supporting evidence.” (Code Civ. Proc. § 437c (b)(1).) Specifically, the
separate statement shall include “citation to the evidence in support of each
material fact must include reference to the exhibit, title, page, and line
numbers.” (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1350(d)(3).
The purpose of the separate statement is to
assist the court in determining quickly and efficiently whether material facts
are disputed. The failure to file a separate statement that conforms to Rule
3.1350 impedes this purpose. (United Community Church v. Garcin (1991) 231
Cal.App.3d 327, 337.) Where the separate statement does not comply, the court
has discretion to continue the motion to permit the party to file a conforming
statement. (United Community Church, supra, 231 Cal.App.3d at 337.)
Additionally, Plaintiff’s expert
declaration for Eris Barillas is missing the referenced Exhibits. Plaintiff is
ordered to file an amended expert declaration with the attached Exhibits.
Trial is
set in this matter for September 29, 2023. Thus, a short continuance will not
affect the ability for this summary judgment to be heard.
Defendants
are ordered to file their amended Separate Statement ten (10) days before the
scheduled hearing. Defendant is further requested to provide or file their
Exhibits 1-5 in electronic form to the court. Plaintiff is to file the Exhibits
to the Barillas Declaration ten (10) days before the scheduled hearing. Any
evidentiary objections are to be filed five (5) days prior to the hearing. No
further briefing will be permitted.
Defendants’ motion for summary
judgment is CONTINUED to June 28, 2023.
Moving Defendants are ordered to
give notice.
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE:
Dated this 25th
day of May 2023
|
|
|
Hon. Michelle
C. Kim Judge
of the Superior Court |