Judge: Michelle C. Kim, Case: 22STCV00193, Date: 2023-06-21 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV00193 Hearing Date: June 21, 2023 Dept: 31
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS
ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
|
Plaintiff,
vs. SOULCYCLE, INC., a corporation,
SOULCYCLE BEVERLY HILLS, LLC, a limited liability company, LINDSAY WARNER, an
individual, and DOES 1 to 50, inclusive, Defendants. |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE] ORDER DENYING AS
MOOT DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER Dept. 31 1:30 p.m. June 21, 2023 |
Plaintiff, Daniel Abram (“Plaintiff”)
moved to compel further responses to form interrogatories, set one and special
interrogatories, set one, on December 13, 2022, on Defendant Soulcycle Beverly
Hills, LLC (“Defendant”). The parties
participated in an Informal Discovery Conference (“IDC”) on March 13, 2023. At the conclusion of the IDC, the court
ordered Defendant to provide further responses to requests nos. 1 through 8 on
Plaintiff’s IDC statement in 30 days.
(Min. Order March 13, 2023.)
On June 7, 2023, Defendant opposed
Plaintiff’s motion, arguing that it is moot because Defendant served the
responses on April 12, 2023, and verified the responses on April 14, 2023. (Decl.
Lee-Gulley ¶¶ 4-5, Exs. B and C.)
To date, Plaintiff has not taken
the motion off calendar, as was requested by the Court after resolution of the
discovery issues at the IDC. As the discovery issues were resolved at the IDC,
this motion is denied as moot.
Moving Plaintiff is ordered to give
notice.
Parties who intend to submit
on this tentative must send an email to the court at sscdept31@lacourt.org indicating intention to submit on the
tentative as directed by the instructions provided on the court website at www.lacourt.org. If
the department does not receive an email indicating the parties are submitting
on the tentative and there are no appearances at the hearing, the motion may be
placed off calendar. If a party
submits on the tentative, the party’s email must include the case number and
must identify the party submitting on the tentative. If the parties do not submit on the
tentative, they should arrange to appear remotely.
Dated this 21st day of June
2023
|
|
|
|
|
Hon. Michelle
C. Kim Judge
of the Superior Court |
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS
ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
|
Plaintiff,
vs. SOULCYCLE, INC., a corporation,
SOULCYCLE BEVERLY HILLS, LLC, a limited liability company, LINDSAY WARNER, an
individual, and DOES 1 to 50, inclusive, Defendants. |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE] ORDER DENYING AS
MOOT DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER Dept. 31 1:30 p.m. June 21, 2023 |
Plaintiff, Daniel Abram (“Plaintiff”)
moved to compel further responses to requests for production of documents, set one,
on December 13, 2022, on Defendant Soulcycle Beverly Hills, LLC (“Defendant”). The parties participated in an Informal
Discovery Conference (“IDC”) on March 13, 2023. At the conclusion of the IDC, the court
ordered Defendant to provide further responses to requests nos. 1 through 8 on
Plaintiff’s IDC statement in 30 days.
(Min. Order March 13, 2023.)
On June 7, 2023, Defendant opposed
Plaintiff’s motion, arguing that it is moot because Defendant served the
responses on May 12, 2023, and verified the responses on May 18, 2023. (Decl. Lee-Gulley
¶¶ 4-5, Exs. B and C.)
To date, Defendant has not taken
the motion off calendar, as specifically requested by the Court after the
discovery issues were resolved at the IDC The motion is denied as moot.
Moving Plaintiff is ordered to give
notice.
Parties who intend to submit
on this tentative must send an email to the court at sscdept31@lacourt.org indicating intention to submit on the
tentative as directed by the instructions provided on the court website at www.lacourt.org. If
the department does not receive an email indicating the parties are submitting
on the tentative and there are no appearances at the hearing, the motion may be
placed off calendar. If a party
submits on the tentative, the party’s email must include the case number and
must identify the party submitting on the tentative. If the parties do not submit on the
tentative, they should arrange to appear remotely.
Dated this 21st day of June
2023
|
|
|
|
|
Hon. Michelle
C. Kim Judge
of the Superior Court |