Judge: Michelle C. Kim, Case: 22STCV02944, Date: 2023-04-10 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV02944 Hearing Date: April 10, 2023 Dept: 31
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
Plaintiff(s), vs. TARGET CORPORATION, ET AL., Defendant(s). | ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: HEARING ON MOTIONS TO COMPEL FURTHER Dept. 31 1:30 p.m. April 10, 2023 |
Defendant Target Corporation’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Compel Further Responses to Interrogatories and Requests for Admissions, all sets one, is premature and will be continued to a new date as set forth below. The parties are ordered to participate in an Informal Discovery Conference (“IDC”) concerning each set of discovery served on Plaintiff as required by the Court’s Standing Order Re: PI Court Procedures, which is available on the LA Superior Court’s website, under the Personal Injury section.
The Eighth Amended Standing Order provides, “PI Hub Courts may deny or continue a Motion to Compel Further Responses to Discovery unless the parties have participated in an IDC before the scheduled hearing on a motion to compel further discovery responses.” Defendant must use the Court’s Reservation System to continue the hearing date on the motion and schedule an IDC. The IDC must be scheduled at least two weeks prior to the continued hearing date on the motion.
If Defendant fails to continue the motion, the Court may deny or take the motion off calendar.
The Court is hopeful the hearing on the motion will not be necessary. If the parties are unable to resolve all outstanding issues at the IDC, the parties must submit a joint statement of items in dispute at least two weeks prior to the continued hearing date. The joint statement must be a single document, with analysis by both parties, addressing each remaining issue.
Moving Defendant is ordered to give notice.
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE:
Dated this 10th day of April 2023
| |
Hon. Michelle C. Kim Judge of the Superior Court |