SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA  

FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT 

 

 

I. Background 

Plaintiff Lizza Schlumbrecht (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against Defendant Karen Solomon (“Defendant”) for injuries arising from a motor vehicle incident. 

 

Plaintiff now moves the Court for an order compelling Defendant to provide further responses to Plaintiff’s request for admissions, set one, and form interrogatories, set one.  

 

II. Informal Discovery Conference (“IDC”) 

Per the Eight Amended Standing Order for Procedures in the Personal Injury Hub Courts effective October 10, 2022 (Filed September 20, 2022), ¶ 9E, “PI Hub Courts will not hear Motions to Compel Further Discovery Responses to Discovery until the parties have engaged in an Informal Discovery Conference (IDC). PI Hub Courts may deny or continue a Motion to Compel Further Responses to Discovery if parties fail to schedule and complete an IDC before the scheduled hearing on a Motion to Compel Further Responses to Discovery.” Additionally, “Reserving or scheduling an IDC does not extend the time to file a Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses.” (Ibid.) The purpose of an IDC is to avoid the necessity of a motion to compel, or to at least reduce its scope. The Eight Amended Standing Order further provides that parties are encouraged to stipulate to extend the deadline for filing a motion to compel further by 60 days to allow time to participate in an IDC and to informally resolve pending discovery issues.   

 

At the IDC on September 27, 2023, the Court found that the IDC did not qualify for the parties to move forward with the motions to compel further, and instructed the moving party to schedule and personally appear at another IDC. (Min. Order, Sept. 27, 2023.) Consequently, Plaintiff’s motions remain premature and must be continued to a new date. The parties are ordered to participate in an Informal Discovery Conference (“IDC”) as required by the Court’s Standing Order Re: PI Court Procedures.  

 

Moving Party is also ordered to continue the Hearing on Motions to Compel Further Discovery Responses using the online reservation management system, at least 3 weeks after the IDC.  

 

The Court is hopeful the hearing on the motions to compel further will not be necessary. If the parties are unable to resolve all outstanding issues at the IDC, the parties must submit a joint statement of items in dispute at least two weeks prior to the continued hearing date. The joint statement must be a single document, with analysis by both parties, addressing each remaining issue.