Judge: Michelle C. Kim, Case: 22STCV13343, Date: 2023-12-20 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 22STCV13343    Hearing Date: March 26, 2024    Dept: 31

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA  

FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT 

 

LUIS RAMIREZ, SANTINO CAREY, and COLE HERSHON, 

Plaintiff(s),  

vs. 

 

CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ET AL., 

 

Defendant(s). 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

      CASE NO: 22STCV13343 

 

[TENTATIVE] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL 

 

Dept. 31 

1:30 p.m.  

March 26, 2024 

 

Plaintiff Santino Carey’s (“Plaintiff Carey”) attorney of record, Jesse L. Halpern of The Halpern Law Firm (“Counsel”), moves to be relieved as counsel contending relief is necessary because Carey has made public statements affecting the working relationship between the parties, making it impossible for Counsel to work with Plaintiff Carey.  

 

Counsel filed proof of service that Plaintiff Carey was served via substituted service with the motion, declaration, and proposed order. (Proof of Service, Feb 5, 2024.) Further, Counsel has attached a proof of service demonstrating service of the papers on Defendants. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1362(d).)    

 

The motion is unopposed and granted; the ruling is effective upon filing proof of service of the final order. Trial is currently set for July 19, 2024. Therefore, there is sufficient time for Plaintiff Carey to seek other counsel or otherwise prepare prior to trial. 

 

Moving Counsel is ordered to give notice.   

 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: 

  • Parties are encouraged to meet and confer after reading this tentative ruling to see if they can reach an agreement. 

  • If a party intends to submit on this tentative ruling,¿the party must send an email to the court at¿sscdept31@lacourt.org¿with the Subject line “SUBMIT” followed by the case number.¿ The body of the email must include the hearing date and time, counsel’s contact information, and the identity of the party submitting. 

  • Unless¿all¿parties submit by email to this tentative ruling, the parties should arrange to appear remotely (encouraged) or in person for oral argument.¿ You should assume that others may appear at the hearing to argue. 

  • If the parties neither submit nor appear at hearing, the Court may take the motion off calendar or adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court.¿ After the Court has issued a tentative ruling, the Court may prohibit the withdrawal of the subject motion without leave. 

 

Dated this 25th day of March 2024 

 

  

 

 

Hon. Michelle C. Kim 

Judge of the Superior Court