Judge: Michelle C. Kim, Case: 22STCV14960, Date: 2023-11-01 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 22STCV14960    Hearing Date: November 28, 2023    Dept: 31

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA  

FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT 

 

MANUEL NAVARRETTE, 

Plaintiff(s),  

vs. 

 

BODEGA LATINA CORP., ET AL., 

 

Defendant(s). 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

      CASE NO: 22STCV14960 

 

[TENTATIVE] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL 

 

Dept. 31 

1:30 p.m.  

November 28, 2023 

 

I. Motions to Compel¿ 

On March 30, 2023, Defendant Chedraui USA, Inc. d/b/a El Super, erroneously sued as Bodega Latina Corp. (“Defendant”) propounded request for production of documents (“RPDs”), set one, on Plaintiff Manuel Navarrette (“Plaintiff”). Defendant agreed to extend the deadline for Plaintiff to provide discovery responses up to June 23, 2023. To date, Plaintiff has not served any responses. Defendant therefore seeks an order compelling Plaintiff to respond, without objections, to the outstanding discovery and to pay sanctions.  

Any opposition was due on or before November 13, 2023; none was filed.  

For a motion to compel discovery responses, all a propounding party must show is that it properly served its discovery requests, that the time to respond has expired, and that the party to whom the requests were directed failed to provide a timely response. (See Leach v. Superior Court (1980) 111 Cal.App.3d 902, 905 906.) Where a party fails to serve timely responses to discovery requests, the court may make an order compelling responses. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.300; Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants (2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 390, 403.) A party that fails to serve timely responses waives any objections to the request, including ones based on privilege or the protection of attorney work product. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.300, subd. (a).)     

Therefore, because the evidence shows Plaintiff was properly served with discovery and failed to respond, Defendant’s motion is GRANTED.  

Plaintiff is ordered to serve verified responses to Defendant’s RPDs, set one, without objections, within fifteen (15) days. (CCP §§ 2031.300 (a),(b).) 

 

II. Sanctions¿ 

Sanctions are mandatory against any party, person, or attorney who unsuccessfully makes or opposes a motion to compel a response to interrogatories, unless a court makes certain findings.¿ (Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.300(c).)¿Plaintiff did not file any opposition. However, sanctions may be awarded, even though no oppositions were filed pursuant to CRC 3.1348(a). Defendant seeks sanctions in the amount of $1,700 for each motion.  

A court has discretion to award sanctions that are “suitable and necessary to enable the party seeking discovery to obtain the objects of the discovery he seeks” but they should not be punitive in nature or levied for the purposes of punishing an offending party. (Vallbona v. Springer (1996) 43 Cal.App.4th 1525, 1545.)   

Therefore, Defendant is awarded 1 hour to prepare the motion and one hour to appear at the hearing, all at the requested rate of $225 per hour, for a total of $450 in attorney fees.  

Sanctions are imposed against Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s attorney of record, jointly and severally.  Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff’s counsel are ordered to pay sanctions to Defendant, by and through counsel of record, in the total amount of $450, within fifteen (15) days. 

 

Moving party is ordered to give notice.   

 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: 

  • Parties are encouraged to meet and confer after reading this tentative ruling to see if they can reach an agreement. 

  • If a party intends to submit on this tentative ruling,¿the party must send an email to the court at¿sscdept31@lacourt.org¿with the Subject line “SUBMIT” followed by the case number.¿ The body of the email must include the hearing date and time, counsel’s contact information, and the identity of the party submitting.¿¿ 

  • Unless¿all¿parties submit by email to this tentative ruling, the parties should arrange to appear remotely (encouraged) or in person for oral argument.¿ You should assume that others may appear at the hearing to argue.¿¿ 

  • If the parties neither submit nor appear at hearing, the Court may take the motion off calendar or adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court.¿ After the Court has issued a tentative ruling, the Court may prohibit the withdrawal of the subject motion without leave.¿ 

 

Dated this 27th day of November 2023 

 

  

 

 

Hon. Michelle C. Kim 

Judge of the Superior Court