Judge: Michelle C. Kim, Case: 22STCV24165, Date: 2023-05-05 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 22STCV24165    Hearing Date: May 5, 2023    Dept: 31

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT

Plaintiff Michael Yedor’s (“Plaintiff”) attorney of record, Nicholas P. Kohan (“Counsel”), moves to be relieved as counsel, contending that irreconcilable differences have arisen between Plaintiff and Counsel making it unreasonably difficult to carry out the employment effectively.  Counsel declares the moving papers were served on Plaintiff via mail at Plaintiff’s last known address after confirming the address as current through text message.  Counsel has filed proof of service on Plaintiff; no other parties have appeared in the action. 

The Court wishes to hear from Counsel concerning how Plaintiff’s address was confirmed current through text message.  Assuming the Court is satisfied with confirmation of the client’s address, the motion will be granted; the ruling is effective upon filing proof of service of the final order.  The Court notes the next scheduled matter is a Final Status Conference set for January 10, 2024, and trial is not scheduled until January 24, 2024.  Therefore, there is sufficient time for Plaintiff to seek other counsel or otherwise prepare prior to trial.

If Counsel is unable to show that they served Plaintiff at a confirmed address, then the requirement that Counsel serve the moving papers on the Clerk of the Court pursuant to CCP §1011(b) and California Rules Court, rule 3.1362(d) would preclude the granting of the motion. 

Counsel is ordered to give notice.

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE:

• Parties are encouraged to meet and confer after reading this tentative ruling to see if they can reach an agreement.
• If a party intends to submit on this tentative ruling, the party must send an email to the court at sscdept31@lacourt.org with the Subject line “SUBMIT” followed by the case number.  The body of the email must include the hearing date and time, counsel’s contact information, and the identity of the party submitting.  
• Unless all parties submit by email to this tentative ruling, the parties should arrange to appear remotely (encouraged) or in person for oral argument.  You should assume that others may appear at the hearing to argue.  
• If the parties neither submit nor appear at hearing, the Court may take the motion off calendar or adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court.  After the Court has issued a tentative ruling, the Court may prohibit the withdrawal of the subject motion without leave. 

Dated this 5^th day of May 2023