Judge: Michelle C. Kim, Case: 23LBCV00210, Date: 2023-08-25 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 23LBCV00210 Hearing Date: August 25, 2023 Dept: 31
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
AARON AMBRIZ CHAVEZ, Plaintiff(s), vs.
DAVID CATTON, ET AL.,
Defendant(s). | ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) | CASE NO: 23LBCV00210
[TENTATIVE] ORDER (1) FINDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL MOOT (2) GRANTING MONETARY SANCTIONS
Dept. 31 1:30 p.m. August 25, 2023 |
1. Motions to Compel
Plaintiff Aaron Ambriz Chavez (“Plaintiff”) propounded request set one of form interrogatories, special interrogatories, request for production of documents (“RFPs”), and requests for admissions (“RFAs”) on Defendant Green Rodent Restoration, Inc. (“Green Rodent”) on March 14, 2023. The parties met and conferred, and an extension was granted. As of the date of filing, Plaintiff avers that he has received no responses to any of Plaintiff’s propounded discovery requests.
However, since the filing of the instant motion, Defendant Green Rodent provides that it served responses to all of Plaintiff’s discovery requests on August 15, 2023. The responses were served without any objections.
In light of Defendant Green Rodent’s representation and supporting evidence that it served verified responses to Plaintiff’s discovery prior to the hearing, the Court finds the motions to compel moot.
2. Sanctions
The sole remaining issue is whether to impose sanctions. Sanctions are mandatory against any party, person, or attorney who unsuccessfully makes or opposes a motion to compel a response to interrogatories, unless a court makes certain findings.¿ (Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.300(c).)¿ Here, Plaintiff filed his motions on July 18, 2023, and Defendant Green Rodent did not serve responses to the outstanding discovery until August 15, 2023. Plaintiff requests $1,000 in connection with each motion. However, the Court notes that the appropriate remedy for failure to serve a timely response to RFAs is not a motion to compel, but to move for an order deeming the truth of the matters admitted. (CCP § 2033.280.) Plaintiff’s citation to CCP § 2033.290 pertains to compelling a further response, which is inapplicable here. Therefore, although sanctions are warranted, the Court will reduce the amount, and not include the defective motion.
Accordingly, Plaintiff is awarded $150 per motion, for only three motions, for a total of $600 in attorney fees. Further, Plaintiff is awarded three motion filing fees of $60, for a total of $180, as costs.
Sanctions are imposed against Defendant Green Rodent Restoration, Inc. and its counsel, jointly and severally. Defendant Green Rodent Restoration, Inc. and/or its counsel are ordered to pay sanctions to Plaintiff, by and through counsel of record, in the total amount of $780, within twenty (20) days.
Plaintiff is ordered to give notice.
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE:
Parties are encouraged to meet and confer after reading this tentative ruling to see if they can reach an agreement.
If a party intends to submit on this tentative ruling,¿the party must send an email to the court at¿sscdept31@lacourt.org¿with the Subject line “SUBMIT” followed by the case number.¿ The body of the email must include the hearing date and time, counsel’s contact information, and the identity of the party submitting.¿¿
Unless¿all¿parties submit by email to this tentative ruling, the parties should arrange to appear remotely (encouraged) or in person for oral argument.¿ You should assume that others may appear at the hearing to argue.¿¿
If the parties neither submit nor appear at hearing, the Court may take the motion off calendar or adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court.¿ After the Court has issued a tentative ruling, the Court may prohibit the withdrawal of the subject motion without leave.¿
Dated this 24th day of August 2023
|
|
| Hon. Michelle C. Kim Judge of the Superior Court
|