Judge: Michelle C. Kim, Case: BC698037, Date: 2023-05-23 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: BC698037 Hearing Date: May 23, 2023 Dept: 31
SUPERIOR
COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR
THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
|
GUADALUPE MONTIEL, an individual
by and through her Guardian ad Litem MARIA MONTIEL, and individual; Plaintiff, vs. GRAND VALLEY HEALTH CARE CENTER,
LLC a California limited liability corporation; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Defendants. |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
CASE NO: BC698037 [TENTATIVE] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
SUBSTITUTE DECEASED PLAINTIFF WITH REPRESENTATIVE OF HER ESTATE Dept. 31 1:30 p.m. May 23, 2023 |
1. Background
Plaintiff Guadalupe Montiel (“Plaintiff”), by
and though her guardian ad litem, Maria Montiel, filed this action against
Defendant Grand Valley Health Care Center, LLC (“Defendant”) for Medical
Malpractice and General Negligence.
Plaintiff was dropped by Defendant’s employee while Plaintiff was under
Defendant’s care. Because of Plaintiff’s
incapacity, an application for appointment of Plaintiff’s sister, Maria Montiel,
as Plaintiff’s guardian ad litem was approved.
At this time, Plaintiff seeks an order
substituting Plaintiff, who has passed away, with the representative of her
estate and bypassing the previously necessary Minor’s Compromise proceeding to
disperse funds. Plaintiff passed away on
January 11, 2022, and an Affidavit for Collection of Personal Property under
Probate Code sections 13100-13106 was issued naming Beatriz Montiel (“Beatriz”)
as Plaintiff’s successor in interest and representative of her estate. The motion states that Beatriz seeks to be
placed into Plaintiff’s shoes in accordance with Code of Civil Procedure
section 377.33. The motion is unopposed.
2. Motion to Substitute Deceased
Plaintiff with Estate Representative
A pending action does not abate by reason of
the plaintiff’s death; instead, the court may make an order substituting the
plaintiff’s personal representative or successor-in-interest as the plaintiff
in the action. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 377.21
and 377.33.) The personal representative
or successor-in-interest must make a motion to be substituted into the
action. (Code Civ. Proc., §
377.31.) The person who seeks to
commence an action or proceeding or to continue a pending action or proceeding
as the decedent's successor in interest must execute and file an affidavit or a
declaration under penalty of perjury asserting statutory required information. (Code Civ. Proc., § 377.32, subd., (a).) The information
provided on the declaration must include:
(1) The
decedent’s name.
(2) The
date and place of the decedent’s death.
(3) “No
proceeding is now pending in California for administration of the decedent’s estate.”
(4) If
the decedent’s estate was administered, a copy of the final order showing the distribution
of the decedent’s cause of action to the successor in interest.
(5) Either of the following,
as appropriate, with facts in support thereof:
(A) “The affiant or declarant is the decedent's successor
in interest (as defined in Section 377.11 of the California Code of Civil
Procedure) and succeeds to the decedent's interest in the action or
proceeding.”
(B) “The affiant or declarant is authorized to act on
behalf of the decedent's successor in interest (as defined in Section 377.11 of
the California Code of Civil Procedure) with respect to the decedent's interest
in the action or proceeding.”
(6) “No other person has a superior right to commence the
action or proceeding or to be substituted for the decedent in the pending
action or proceeding.”
(7) “The affiant or declarant affirms or declares under
penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing
is true and correct.”
(Id.) Further, A certified copy of the
decedent’s death certificate must be attached to the declaration. (Code
Civ. Proc. §§ 377.32, subd., (c).) Code of Civil Procedure
section 377.33 enables “[t]he court in which an action is
commenced . . . [to] make any order concerning parties that is appropriate to
ensure proper administration of justice in the case.”
Here, the Court may substitute Plaintiff’s
successor-in-interest, Beatriz, as the plaintiff in the action pursuant to Code
of Civil Procedure section 377.33. The
Court finds that the Declaration of Beatriz comports with the statutory
required information in Code of Civil Procedure section 377.32, subdivision
(a). (Montiel Decl.; Exhs. “A” and “B.”)
Also, a certified copy of the decedent’s
death certificate is attached to the Declaration of Beatriz pursuant to Code of
Civil Procedure section 377.32, subdivision (c). (Id.)
Accordingly, the motion is GRANTED.
The Court substitutes Plaintiff’s
successor-in-interest, Beatriz Montiel, as the plaintiff in the action.
The Court orders the release of funds to settle
Plaintiff’s estate.
Plaintiff
is ordered to give notice.
PLEASE TAKE
NOTICE:
·
Parties
are encouraged to meet and confer after reading this tentative ruling to see if
they can reach an agreement.
·
If
a party intends to submit on this tentative ruling,¿the party must send an
email to the court at¿sscdept31@lacourt.org¿with the Subject line “SUBMIT”
followed by the case number.¿ The body of the email must include the hearing
date and time, counsel’s contact information, and the identity of the party
submitting.¿¿
·
Unless¿all¿parties
submit by email to this tentative ruling, the parties should arrange to appear
remotely (encouraged) or in person for oral argument.¿ You should assume that
others may appear at the hearing to argue.¿¿
·
If
the parties neither submit nor appear at hearing, the Court may take the motion
off calendar or adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court.¿ After
the Court has issued a tentative ruling, the Court may prohibit the withdrawal
of the subject motion without leave.¿
Dated this 23rd day of May 2023
|
|
|
|
|
Hon.
Michelle Kim Judge
of the Superior Court |