Judge: Monica Bachner, Case: 22STCV20518, Date: 2023-02-28 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV20518 Hearing Date: February 28, 2023 Dept: 71
Superior
Court of California
County
of Los Angeles
DEPARTMENT 71
TENTATIVE
RULING
JUAN ELIAS POLANCO,
vs. ANTONIO J. POLANCO, et al. |
Case No.:
22STCV20518 Hearing Date: February 28, 2023 |
Status Conference regarding Default Judgment Packet is
continued to March 30, 2023, at 8:30 AM in Department 71 at Stanley Mosk
Courthouse for the following reasons:
1. Cost memorandum on the back of CIV-100
is not supported by invoices to support the “deeds and record lis pendens.”
2. CIV-100 indicates damages are in the
amount of $749,700 for a total judgment of $749,700. However, the JUD-100
indicates damages are in the amount of $0, for a total judgment of $8,321.18.
a. JUD-100 “Other (specify)” box 6a(5) is
not selected, but “Other (specify)” box 7 is selected and indicates “For a sale
of the Subject Property per the Proposed Interlocutory Judgment. Defendant,
Antonio J. Polanco, to receive $40,000 from the sale proceeds minus the above
stated attorney’s fees and costs. Plaintiff, Juan Elias Polanco, to receive the
remaining sale proceeds.”
3. It is unclear what amount for
attorney’s fees should be calculated according to the local rule based on
discrepancy in damages sought on JUD-100 and CIV-100. Plaintiff seeks
attorneys’ fees in the amount of $7,500 but does not provide a calculation for
how the amount was determined.
4. No exhibits are attached to the
declarations.
5. The Proposed Interlocutory Judgment for
Partition by Sale would need to be entered before there is a final judgment.
6.
Since this action affects property, an
evidentiary hearing is required.