Judge: Monica Bachner, Case: BC643861, Date: 2022-07-28 Tentative Ruling

Department 71: Attorneys who elect to submit on these published tentative rulings, without making an appearance at the hearing, may so notify the Court by communicating this to the Department's staff at (213) 830-0771 before the set hearing time.  See, e.g., CRC Rule 324(b).   All parties are otherwise encouraged to appear by Court Call for all matters.

Case Number: BC643861    Hearing Date: July 28, 2022    Dept: 71

Superior Court of California

County of Los Angeles

 

DEPARTMENT 71

 

TENTATIVE RULING

 

A.C.A. LLC, 

 

         vs.

 

MYRON JEPPSON HOLSTROM, et al.

 Case No.:  BC643861

 

 

 

 Hearing Date:  July 28, 2022

 

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is continued to August 25, 2022.

 

Defendants DOE 101 Paola Caldera (“P. Caldera”), DOE 102 Mian Guo erroneously sued as Mian Gvo (“Guo”), DOE 103 Jia Shen (“Shen”), DOE 104 Yunying Li erroneously sued as Yun Ying Li (“Li”), DOE 105 Min Zhou (“Zhou”), DOE 112 Yavuz Ertas (“Ertas”), DOE 113 Nima Razfar (“Nima”), DOE 114 Ali Razfar (“Ali”), DOE 115 Jessica Caldera (“J. Caldera”), DOE 116 Nadia Saban (“Nadia”), DOE 117 Lebiba Saban erroneously sued as Lily Saban (“Lebiba”), DOE 118 Paul Luigi (“Luigi”), DOE 119 Ganchimeg Oyunchimeg erroneously sued as JanChungOzu (“Oyunchimeg”), DOE 120 Daniel Sacilotto (“Sacilotto”), and DOE 121 Arnaud Larousse erroneously sued as Arnald LaRousse (“Larousse”) (collectively, “Defendants”) move for summary judgment on the second amended complaint (“SAC”) filed by Plaintiff A.C.A. LLC (“Plaintiff”) on June 2, 2021.  In the alternative, Defendants move for summary adjudication of the 1st (declaratory relief), 2nd (ejectment) 3rd (trespass), 4th (aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty), 5th (intentional interference with contractual relations), 6th (declaratory relief – in the alternative), and 7th (breach of contract – in the alternative) causes of action.

 

          Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is continued to August 25, 2022.  Trial is currently set for September 6, 2022.  The Court finds good cause for hearing the motion later than 30 days before the date of trial. (C.C.P. §437c(a)(3).) 

 

Dated:  July _____, 2022

                                                                                                                       

Hon. Monica Bachner

Judge of the Superior Court