Judge Olivia Rosales, Case 19NWCV00083 2022-09-01 Tentative Ruling

Judge: Olivia Rosales, Case: 19NWCV00083, Date: 2022-09-01 Tentative Ruling

DEPARTMENT SE-C LAW & MOTION PROCEDURES ARE AS FOLLOWS: APPEARANCES: The Court will hear oral arguments on all matters at the scheduled time of hearing. If all counsel intend to submit on the Tentative Order and do not want oral argument, please advise the clerk, in Department “C”, by calling (562-345-3702). If all sides submit on the Tentative Order and the clerk is so advised, the Tentative Order will become the final order of the court and the prevailing party shall give written Notice of Ruling per CRC 3.1312. If the Moving and Responding parties do not agree to submit on the Tentative Order, the motion will be called as calendared for hearing. There is no need to contact Department “C”, as the matter will remain on calendar for hearing. If the Moving party does not call Department “C” to submit on the Tentative Order and there is no appearance by any party, then the motion(s), at the Court’s discretion, may be taken off calendar without ruling on the motion(s). ORDERS: The minute order reflecting the Court’s Order will constitute the final Order. No additional orders should be submitted to the Court for signature unless required by law or by the Court. Prevailing party shall give written Notice of Ruling per CRC 3.1312. Minute orders, which constitute the final Order of the Court, will only be sent to the parties via U.S. mail for the following: OSC re: sanctions, OSC re: contempt or matters taken under submission after oral arguments or briefing. Counsel or parties may request copies of all other minute orders/final orders either at the clerk’s office or in writing. If a request is in writing, a self-addressed stamped envelope and the appropriate fee for copies shall be submitted.

Case Number: 19NWCV00083 Hearing Date: September 1, 2022 Dept: SEC

KELTERITE CORPORATION v. CITY OF SANTA FE SPRINGS

CASE NO.: 19NWCV00083

HEARING: 09/01/22

JUDGE: OLIVIA ROSALES

TENTATIVE ORDER

Defendant/Cross-Complainant DANIEL REYES’ motion to bifurcate is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Moving Party to give Notice.

The Motion to Bifurcate the issues of damages is DENIED without prejudice to its reassertion before the trial judge. The Court finds that the trial judge will be in the best position to determine the order in which matters are considered at trial. Pursuant to CCP §598, the trial judge can make this determination on his/her own motion at any time.