Judge: Olivia Rosales, Case: 21NWCV00227, Date: 2022-09-01 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21NWCV00227 Hearing Date: September 1, 2022 Dept: SEC
ORTEGON v.
CORTAZAR
CASE NO.: 21NWCV00227
HEARING: 09/01/22
JUDGE: OLIVIA ROSALES
#6
TENTATIVE ORDER
Plaintiff’s unopposed Motion for Issue Sanctions is DENIED
without prejudice. Plaintiff’s unopposed Motion for Monetary Sanctions is GRANTED
in part.
Moving Party to give Notice.
This matter was continued from August 11, 2022 to September
1, 2022 in order to afford Defendant the opportunity to file an Opposition by
no later than August 24, 2022. Notwithstanding, no Opposition has been filed as
of August 30, 2022.
Plaintiff moves for an order imposing issue and/or monetary
sanctions against Defendant CAROLINA CORTAZAR.
The Court may impose monetary, issue, evidence, and
terminating sanctions against anyone engaging in conduct that is a misuse of
the discovery process. (CCP §2023.030.) Misuses of the discovery process
include failing to respond or to submit to an authorized method of discovery
and disobeying a court order to provide discovery. (CCP §2023.010(d) and (g).)
Plaintiff submits evidence showing that Defendant Cortazar
has engaged in a misuse of the discovery process. Specifically, Plaintiff
proffers undisputed evidence showing that Defendant Cortazar failed to comply
with this Court’s March 24, 2022 Discovery Order. (D’Amico Decl., Exs. A and
B.)
Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff’s unopposed Motion is
GRANTED in part. Plaintiff’s request for monetary sanctions is granted in the
reduced amount of $2585.17 ($375/hr. x 6 hrs.) (costs $85.17 + $250).
Plaintiff’s request for issue sanctions is DENIED without
prejudice. The Court finds that Plaintiff fails to demonstrate the propriety of
such a harsh and punitive sanction at this stage, where the March 24, 2022
Order is the only Order which Defendant has failed to comply with. In addition,
the Court does not find that issue sanctions are warranted at this time in
light of the fact that Defendant Cortazar has not completely refused to comply
with the discovery process in this action. There appears to have been some
partial compliance where some of Defendant Cortazar’s responses to discovery
requests were served on April 14, 2022. (See 07/07/22 Order.)
The Court will however ORDER Defendant CORTAZAR to comply
with this Court’s March 24, 2022 Order requiring CORTAZAR to allow Plaintiff’s
attorney to enter the Property located at 12418 Bombardier Avenue, Norwalk,
California 90650-2409 (“Premises”) for the purpose of inspecting and
photographing that portion of the Premises formerly occupied by Plaintiff by no
later than 30 days from the date of the Court’s issuance of this Order.
Defendant Cortazar is advised that failure to comply with
this Order or further discovery abuse may result in additional sanctions,
including monetary, evidentiary, issue, or terminating sanctions.