Judge: Peter A. Hernandez, Case: 23PSCV03068, Date: 2024-02-06 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 23PSCV03068 Hearing Date: February 6, 2024 Dept: K
Petitioner Mercury
Insurance Company’s Petition to Compel Underinsured Motorist Arbitration is DENIED
without prejudice.
Background
On October 4, 2023, Petitioner Mercury Insurance Company (“Petitioner”) filed (and electronically served to attorney Hussein H. Saleh of The Dominguez Firm) a “Petition to Assign Case Number for Purpose of Compel[l]ing Arbitration and for the Court to Select a Neutral Arbitrator.”
On October 13, 2023, Petitioner filed the instant petition.
A Case Management Conference and an Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to File Proof of Service are set for March 7, 2024.
Discussion
Petitioner seeks an order compelling Respondent Maria Vega (“Respondent”) to submit to arbitration.
The petition is summarily denied without prejudice. Petitioner’s counsel David Hillier (“Hillier”) represents that “[P]etitioner’s insurance policy with the relevant portions highlighted” is attached as Exhibit D to his declaration (Hillier Decl., ¶ 9); Exhibit 9, however, appears to be an incomplete copy of the policy, inasmuch as the court is unable to locate the arbitration provision purportedly contained therein (i.e., as set forth on page 4 of the petition).
Further, it is unclear whether or not Respondent received service of a copy of the petition and notice of the hearing in compliance with Code of Civil Procedure § 1290.4[1]. The proof of service accompanying the petition reflects that the petition was only electronically served on attorney Hussein H. Saleh of The Dominguez Firm. If Petitioner has, in fact, quoted the entirety of the arbitration policy on page 4 of the petition correctly, then it would appear to the court that service of the petition must be made pursuant to subdivision (b)(1), which has not been done.
[1] Subdivision (a) provides that “[a
copy of the petition and a written notice of the time and place of the hearing
thereof and any other papers upon which the petition is based shall be
served in the manner provided in the arbitration agreement for the service of
such petition and notice.” (Emphasis
added.)
Subdivision (b) provides that “[if the arbitration agreement does not provide the manner in which such service shall be made and the person upon whom service is to be made has not previously appeared in the proceeding and has not previously been served in accordance with this subdivision:
(1) Service within this State shall be made in the manner provided by law for the service of summons in an action. . .” (Emphasis added.)