Judge: Peter A. Hernandez, Case: 24STCV15577, Date: 2025-03-04 Tentative Ruling
The Court often posts its tentative several days in advance of the hearing. Please re-check the tentative rulings the day before the hearing to be sure that the Court has not revised the ruling since the time it was posted.
Please call the clerk at (213) 633-0154 by 4:00 pm. the court day before the hearing if you wish to submit on the tentative.
Case Number: 24STCV15577 Hearing Date: March 4, 2025 Dept: 34
Plaintiff Nicholas Woods’ Counsel Jason G. Eisenberg and R. Bret Beattie’s
Motion to be Relieved as Counsel is GRANTED, effective upon the filing
of proof of service showing service of the signed order.
Background
On June 21, 2024, Plaintiff Nicholas
Woods (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint against Defendants Brenda Lara and Los
Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (“Defendants”) arising
from Defendant Brenda Lara negligently closing a bus door on Plaintiff’s leg alleging
causes of action for:
1. Motor
Vehicle; and
2. General
Negligence.
On January 14, 2025, counsel for Plaintiff, Jason G. Eisenberg and R. Bret Beattie (“Counsel”), filed: (1) MC-051, Motion to be Relieved as Counsel;
(2) MC-052, Declaration in Support of Motion to be Relieved as Counsel; (3)
MC-053, Proposed Order; and (4) Proof of Service. No opposition or other response has been
filed.
Legal Standard
“The attorney in an action or special proceeding may be
changed at any time before or after judgment or final determination, as
follows: 1. Upon the consent of both client and attorney, filed with the clerk,
or entered upon the minutes; 2. Upon the order of the court, upon the
application of either client or attorney, after notice from one to the other.”
(Code Civ. Proc., § 284.)
An attorney moving to be relieved as counsel under
California Code of Civil Procedure section 284(2) must meet the requirements
set out in California Rules of Court, rule 3.1362.
To comply with rule 3.1362, the moving party must
submit the following forms: (1) Notice of Motion and Motion to be Relieved as
Counsel; (2) Declaration in Support of Attorney's Motion to be Relieved as
Counsel; and (3) Order Granting Attorney's Motion to be Relieved as Counsel.
(Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1362(a), (c), (e).)
The moving party must serve the aforementioned forms on
the client and all other parties who have appeared in the case. (Cal. Rules of
Court, rule 3.1362(d).) Further, when the client is served by mail, the
attorney's declaration must show that the client's address was confirmed within
the last 30 days and how it was confirmed. (Ibid.)
Absent a showing of resulting prejudice, an attorney’s
request for withdrawal should be granted.
(People v. Prince (1968) 268 Cal.App.2d 398, 406.)
Discussion
Counsel’s motion complies with the requirements of
California Rules of Court, rule 3.1362, in that Counsel provided the motion to
be relieved as counsel, a declaration in support, a proposed order granting
Counsel’s motion; and proof of service.
The declaration states
that there has been a breakdown in the attorney-client relationship between
Counsel and Plaintiff. (Eisenberg Decl., ¶ 2.) Counsel also declares that a Substitution of Attorney form sent on December 5, 2024,
was never answered or returned to Counsel. (Ibid.)
The court determines
that the requirements of Rules of Court Rule 3.1362 enumerated above have been
sufficiently met. The court grants the requested withdrawal effective upon the
filing of proof of service showing service of the signed order to Plaintiff.
Conclusion
Plaintiff Nicholas Woods’ Counsel Jason G. Eisenberg
and R. Bret Beattie’s Motion to be Relieved as Counsel is GRANTED, effective
upon the filing of proof of service showing service of the signed order.