Judge: Robert B. Broadbelt, Case: 18STCV09180, Date: 2023-02-02 Tentative Ruling
Tentative rulings are sometimes, but not always, posted. The purpose of posting a tentative ruling is to to help focus the argument. The posting of a tentative ruling is not an invitation for the filing of additional papers shortly before the hearing.
Case Number: 18STCV09180 Hearing Date: February 2, 2023 Dept: 53
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles – Central District
Department
53
|
vs. |
Case
No.: |
18STCV09180 |
|
|
|
|
|
Hearing
Date: |
February
2, 2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time: |
11:00
a.m. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Tentative]
Order RE: defendants’ motion to bifurcate trial |
||
MOVING PARTIES:
Defendants Ocean Avenue LLC
d/b/a Fairmont Miramar Hotels and Dirk D’Jon Mornay
RESPONDING PARTY: Unopposed
Motion to Bifurcate Trial
The court
considered the moving papers filed in connection with this motion. No opposition papers were filed.
DISCUSSION
Defendants Ocean
Avenue LLC d/b/a Fairmont Miramar Hotels and Dirk D’Jon Mornay (“Defendants”)
move the court for an order (1) bifurcating all issues pertaining to plaintiff
Alison Cervantes’s request for punitive damages from all other issues to be
tried in this action, and (2) precluding plaintiff Allison Cervantes from
introducing any reference to and evidence of her claim for entitlement of
punitive damages pending a finding that Defendants acted with fraud,
oppression, or malice.
Defendants move the court to bifurcate trial pursuant to Civil Code
section 3295 and Code of Civil Procedure section 598, contending that (1)
preclusion of evidence relating to punitive damages is mandatory under the Civil
Code, and (2) bifurcation is warranted under Code of Civil Procedure section
598 because it is judicially efficient, will avoid jury confusion, and will
avoid prejudicing Defendants.
Civil Code section 3295, subdivision (d) provides that “[t]he court
shall, on application of any defendant, preclude the admission of evidence of
that defendant’s profits or financial condition until after the trier of fact
returns a verdict for plaintiff awarding actual damages and finds that a defendant
is guilty of malice, oppression, or fraud in accordance with Section 3294.¿
Evidence of profit and financial condition shall be admissible only as to the
defendant or defendants found to be liable to the plaintiff and to be guilty of
malice, oppression, or fraud.¿ Evidence of profit and financial condition shall
be presented to the same trier of fact that found for the plaintiff and found
one or more defendants guilty of malice, oppression, or fraud.”¿
“While the statute refers only to evidence of the defendant’s
financial condition, in practice bifurcation under this section means that all
evidence relating to the amount of punitive damages is to be offered in
the second phase, while the determination whether plaintiff is entitled
to punitive damages (i.e., whether the defendant is guilty of malice, fraud or
oppression) is decided in the first phase along with compensatory damages.”¿ (Holdgrafer
v. Unocal Corp. (2008) 160 Cal.App.4th 907, 919.)¿¿¿
The court finds that Defendants are entitled to an order bifurcating trial
pursuant to Civil Code section 3295, and therefore grants Defendants’ motion
and makes the orders set forth below. (Civ. Code, § 3295, subd. (d).)
ORDER
The court grants defendants Ocean Avenue LLC d/b/a Fairmont Miramar
Hotels and Dirk D’Jon Mornay’s motion to bifurcate trial as set forth
below. (Civ. Code, § 3295, subd. (d).)
The court orders trial of this action will be bifurcated as follows:¿
(1) the jury will first decide the issues of whether to impose liability for
compensatory damages and, if so, the amount of compensatory damages and whether
defendants Ocean Avenue LLC d/b/a Fairmont Miramar Hotels and Dirk D’Jon Mornay
are guilty of malice, oppression, or fraud, and (2) only after making findings
in plaintiff Allison Cervantes’s favor on all of those issues, the jury will
then decide the issue of whether to impose punitive damages against defendants
Ocean Avenue LLC d/b/a Fairmont Miramar Hotels and Dirk D’Jon Mornay.¿
The court orders that the admission of evidence of defendants Ocean
Avenue LLC d/b/a Fairmont Miramar Hotels and Dirk D’Jon Mornay’s profits or
financial condition shall be precluded until after the trier of fact returns a
verdict for plaintiff Allison Cervantes awarding actual damages and finds defendants
Ocean Avenue LLC d/b/a Fairmont Miramar Hotels and Dirk D’Jon Mornay are guilty
of malice, oppression, or fraud in accordance with Civil Code section 3294.¿
(Civ. Code, § 3259, subd. (d).)¿ Evidence of profit and financial condition
shall be presented to the same trier of fact that found for plaintiff Allison
Cervantes and found defendants Ocean Avenue LLC d/b/a Fairmont Miramar Hotels
and Dirk D’Jon Mornay guilty of malice, oppression, or fraud.¿ (Civ. Code, §
3259, subd. (d).)¿¿¿
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:
_____________________________
Robert
B. Broadbelt III
Judge
of the Superior Court