Judge: Robert B. Broadbelt, Case: 19STCV13450, Date: 2022-08-09 Tentative Ruling
Tentative rulings are sometimes, but not always, posted. The purpose of posting a tentative ruling is to to help focus the argument. The posting of a tentative ruling is not an invitation for the filing of additional papers shortly before the hearing.
Case Number: 19STCV13450 Hearing Date: August 9, 2022 Dept: 53
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles – Central District
Department
53
vs. |
Case
No.: |
19STCV13450 |
|
|
|
Hearing
Date: |
August
9, 2022 |
|
|
|
|
Time: |
|
|
|
|
|
[Tentative]
Order (1)
motion to
deem requests for admission admitted; (2)
motion
to compel responses to special interrogatories; and (3)
motion
to compel responses to request for production of documents. |
MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff Ivan Mendoza
RESPONDING PARTY: Unopposed
(1)
Motion
to Deem Requests for Admission Admitted
MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff Ivan Mendoza
RESPONDING PARTY: Unopposed
(2)
Motion
to Compel Responses to Special Interrogatories
MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff Ivan Mendoza
RESPONDING PARTY: Unopposed
(3)
Motion
to Compel Responses to Requests for Production of Documents
The court
considered the moving papers filed in connection with each motion. No opposition papers were filed.
DISCUSSION
Plaintiff Ivan Mendoza (“Plaintiff”) served his Requests for
Admissions (Set One) on defendant Soon Pill Kim (“Defendant”) on October 8,
2020. (Moorhead Decl., ¶ 4.) Defendant did not serve responses to
Plaintiff’s Requests for Admissions.
(Moorhead Decl., ¶ 5.)
If a party to whom requests for admissions are directed fails to serve
a timely response, the court must, upon motion by the propounding party, order
the matters specified in the requests be deemed admitted unless the court finds
that the party to whom the requests for admission have been directed has served
substantially compliant responses before the hearing on the motion. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.280, subd. (b),
(c).)
Defendant has not filed an opposition or presented evidence
establishing that responses have been served.
The court therefore grants Plaintiff’s motion to deem his requests for
admissions admitted. (Code Civ. Proc., §
2033.280.)
The court grants Plaintiff’s request for sanctions against
Defendant. The court finds that monetary
sanctions in the amount of $810 ((1.5 hours x $500 hourly rate) + $60 motion
filing fee = $810) is a reasonable amount of monetary sanctions to impose
against Defendant on this motion. (Code
Civ. Proc., § 2033.280, subd. (c).)
Plaintiff served his Special Interrogatories (Set One) on Defendant on
October 8, 2020, and Defendant did not serve responses. (Moorhead Decl., ¶¶ 4-5.)
Defendant has not opposed Plaintiff’s motion or presented evidence to
the court establishing that he has served responses. The court therefore grants Plaintiff’s motion
to compel Defendant’s responses to Plaintiff’s Special Interrogatories (Set
One) served on October 8, 2020. (Code
Civ. Proc., § 2030.290, subd. (b).)
The court grants Plaintiff’s request for sanctions against
Defendant. The court finds that monetary
sanctions in the amount of $810 ((1.5 hours x $500 hourly rate) + $60 motion
filing fee) is a reasonable amount of monetary sanctions to impose against Defendant
on this motion. (Code Civ. Proc., §
2030.290, subd. (c).)
Plaintiff served his Request for Production of Documents (Set One) on
Defendant on October 8, 2020, and Defendant did not serve responses. (Moorhead Decl., ¶¶ 4-5.)
Defendant has not filed opposition papers establishing that responses
have been served. The court therefore grants Plaintiff’s motion to compel
Defendant’s responses to Plaintiff’s Request for Production of Documents (Set
One) served on October 8, 2020. (Code
Civ. Proc., § 2031.300, subd. (b).)
The court grants Plaintiff’s request for sanctions. The court finds that monetary sanctions in
the amount of $810 ((1.5 hours x $500 hourly rate) + $60 motion filing fee) is
a reasonable amount of monetary sanctions to impose against Defendant on this
motion. (Code Civ. Proc.,
§ 2031.300, subd. (c).)
ORDER
The court grants plaintiff Ivan
Mendoza’s Motion to Deem Requests for Admissions Admitted. The court orders that the truth of the
matters specified in Plaintiff’s Request for Admissions (Set One), served on
October 8, 2020, is deemed admitted.
(Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.280, subd. (b).)
The court grants plaintiff Ivan
Mendoza’s Motion to Compel Responses to Special Interrogatories (Set One). (Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.290, subd. (b).)
Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2030.290, the court orders
defendant Soon Pill Kim to serve on plaintiff Ivan Mendoza full and complete
verified answers, without objections, to plaintiff Ivan Mendoza’s Special
Interrogatories (Set One) that comply with Code of Civil Procedure sections
2030.220 and 2030.250, subdivisions (a) and (b), within 20 days of the date of
this order.
The court grants plaintiff Ivan
Mendoza’s Motion to Compel Responses to Request for Production (Set One). (Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.300, subd. (b).)
Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2031.300, the court orders
defendant Soon Pill Kim (1) to serve on plaintiff Ivan Mendoza full and
complete verified responses, without objections, to plaintiff Ivan Mendoza’s
Request for Production (Set One) that comply with Code of Civil Procedure
sections 2031.210 through 2031.250, and (2) to produce to plaintiff Ivan
Mendoza all documents and things in defendant Soon Pill Kim’s possession,
custody, or control which are responsive to those requests, within 20 days of
the date of this order.
The court grants plaintiff Ivan
Mendoza’s requests for monetary sanctions against defendant Soon Pill Kim. The court orders defendant Soon Pill Kim to
pay monetary sanctions to plaintiff Ivan Mendoza in the amount of $2,430 ($810
x 3) within 30 days of the date of this order.
(Code Civ. Proc., §§ 2033.280, subd. (c), 2030.290, subd. (c), 2031.300,
subd. (c).)
The court orders plaintiff Ivan
Mendoza to give notice of this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:
_____________________________
Robert
B. Broadbelt III
Judge
of the Superior Court