Judge: Robert B. Broadbelt, Case: 19STCV17440, Date: 2023-10-04 Tentative Ruling
Tentative rulings are sometimes, but not always, posted. The purpose of posting a tentative ruling is to to help focus the argument. The posting of a tentative ruling is not an invitation for the filing of additional papers shortly before the hearing.
Case Number: 19STCV17440 Hearing Date: October 4, 2023 Dept: 53
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles – Central District
Department
53
|
vs. |
Case
No.: |
19STCV17440 |
|
|
|
|
|
Hearing
Date: |
October
4, 2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Tentative]
Order RE: defendant’s motion to compel further
responses to requests for production of documents |
||
MOVING PARTY: Defendant Grigor Demirchyan
RESPONDING PARTY: Plaintiff Davit Gasparyan
Motion to Compel Further Responses to
Requests for Production of Documents
The court considered the moving and opposition papers filed in
connection with this motion. The court
exercised its discretion to consider the untimely reply papers filed on
September 29, 2023.
DISCUSSION
Defendant Grigor Demirchyan (“Defendant”) moves the court for an order
(1) compelling plaintiff David Gasparyan (“Plaintiff”) to provide further
responses to Defendant’s Requests for Production of Documents, numbers 2-9, and
(2) awarding sanctions in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff in the
amount of $6,061.65.
The court grants Defendant’s motion to compel Plaintiff’s further
responses to Requests for Production of Documents, numbers 2-9 because the
objections to those requests are without merit.
(Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.310, subd. (a)(3).) The court finds that each of those document
requests is essentially a request that Plaintiff produce all documents which
support an allegation in Plaintiff’s operative complaint.
The court denies Defendant’s request for monetary sanctions against
Plaintiff because the court finds that the circumstances presented would make
the imposition of sanctions unjust.
(Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.310, subd. (h).)
ORDER
The court grants defendant Grigor Demirchyan’s motion to compel
further responses to requests for production as follows.
Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2031.310, the court orders
plaintiff Davit Gasparyan (1) to serve on defendant Grigor Demirchyan further
written responses to Requests for Production of Documents, numbers 2-9, and (2)
to produce to defendant Grigor Demirchyan all documents and things in plaintiff
Davit Gasparyan’s possession, custody, or control, which are responsive to
those requests, within 20 days of the date of this order.
The court denies defendant Grigor Demirchyan’s request for monetary
sanctions.
The court orders defendant Grigor Demirchyan to give notice of this
ruling.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:
_____________________________
Robert
B. Broadbelt III
Judge
of the Superior Court